Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cwinvestments/memstack --skill licensinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cwinvestments/memstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/licensing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/licensing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/licensing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/licensing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/licensing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 63 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.03797 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.01519 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00759 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00380 |
Grade A, and why
memstack-business-licensing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 267 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Licensing: Commercial-use license audit from the repo...
Scans a repository for every license that touches the product (deps, vendored code, fonts, assets), then produces a per-package verdict table marking each as Ready, Citation Required, Needs Info, or Not Allowed for commercial use.
Activation
When this skill activates, output:
Licensing, Commercial-use license audit from the repo...
Then execute the protocol below.
Context Guard
| Context | Status |
|---|---|
| User says "license audit", "licensing", "license check" | ACTIVE |
| User asks "can I use this commercially?" or "is this safe to ship?" | ACTIVE |
| User mentions GPL, AGPL, LGPL, MPL, MIT, BSD, Apache, copyleft | ACTIVE |
| User is preparing to ship, sell, or relicense a product | ACTIVE |
| User wants security vulnerability scanning | DORMANT: use dependency-audit |
| User wants a service contract or NDA | DORMANT: use contract-template |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
| "MIT and GPL are both open source so they're compatible" | Combining MIT into GPL is fine; the reverse forces your code under GPL. Direction matters. |
| "We don't distribute, so AGPL doesn't apply" | AGPL §13 triggers on network use. SaaS counts. |
| "It's on GitHub so it's free to use" | Public ≠ licensed. No LICENSE file = all rights reserved. |
| "Transitive dependencies don't matter" | Your bundle ships every dep in the tree. Copyleft transitives can taint the whole product. |
| "License from package.json metadata is authoritative" | The actual LICENSE file in upstream source is authoritative. Metadata is often wrong, missing, or outdated. |
| "BSL / SSPL / Elastic / Commons Clause are open source" | They are not OSI-approved and usually restrict commercial hosting or competition. Read the actual terms. |
Disclaimer: Produces a license inventory and risk assessment, not legal advice. License interpretation (especially copyleft scope, "linking", and SaaS triggers) is contested. Engage IP counsel before shipping high-stakes products.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed bd542b0c60e1
- 1mo ago First seen · 267 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 2b5738a85e79
memstack-business-licensing is a skill published in the GitHub repository cwinvestments/memstack (425 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 3,797 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
contract-redliner
Contract review, redlining, and negotiation support with clause analysis, risk identification, and markup templates. Use when reviewing contracts, identifying unfavorable terms, suggesting amendments, or preparing negotiation positions.
legal-compliance
Legal and compliance expertise for corporate governance, contract analysis, regulatory compliance (SOX, GDPR, HIPAA), risk assessment, intellectual property, and litigation management. Use when reviewing contracts, ensuring compliance, or managing legal risk.
ai-policy-generator
AI governance policy creation for nonprofits and enterprises with frameworks, risk assessment, ethical guidelines, and compliance templates. Use when drafting AI usage policies, responsible AI frameworks, or organizational AI governance documents.
compliance-engineering
SOC2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, FedRAMP compliance implementation in code. Audit logging, data encryption, access controls, privacy by design, and regulatory requirement mapping. Use when implementing compliance controls, preparing for audits, or building privacy-compliant systems.
agent-compliance-engineer
Specialist subagent: SOC2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS compliance implementation specialist. Use when implementing audit logging, data encryption, access controls, privacy by design, or preparing for compliance audits. Trigger phrases: SOC2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI, compliance, audit log, data privacy, encryption, access control…
negotiator
Negotiation analyst for high-stakes deals: co-founder exits, business separations, contract terms, salary negotiations, investor terms. Use when the user asks to: (1) analyze a counterparty's position or message, (2) score/review a draft message before sending, (3) draft a counter-offer, (4) structure BATNA/ZOPA…