Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit --skill async-hygienegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit/async-hygiene)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit/async-hygiene"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit/async-hygiene/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit/async-hygiene"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit/async-hygiene.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
async-hygiene scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to async-hygiene — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Async/Await Hygiene Sweep
Scan the target scope (default: whole solution) for each anti-pattern, in this order, and fix with the standard remedy:
| Anti-pattern | Find | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Sync-over-async | .Result, .Wait(), .GetAwaiter().GetResult() |
Make the caller async and await |
async void |
any non-event-handler | Return Task |
| Missing CancellationToken | async public methods without a token parameter | Add CancellationToken cancellationToken = default and thread it through |
| Fire-and-forget | unawaited Task-returning calls | Await, or route through a background service with error handling |
Task.Run in ASP.NET request path |
Task.Run( in Api project |
Remove — the request is already on a thread-pool thread |
| Async lambda passed to sync delegate | async lambda to Action<> |
Change delegate type or restructure |
Unnecessary async/await wrapper |
method whose only await is the final return | Return the Task directly (unless in a using/try) |
| Blocking I/O in async method | File.ReadAllText, Thread.Sleep inside async |
Use async equivalents (ReadAllTextAsync, Task.Delay) |
Process: grep for each pattern → read the surrounding code (some hits are legitimate, e.g. Main, console tools) → fix true positives → dotnet build → report a table of what changed and any hits deliberately left alone with reasoning.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 80c2bc150c7a
async-hygiene is a skill published in the GitHub repository cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-code-kit (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 389 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to async-hygiene, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-dotnet-performance
Scans .NET code for 50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.
code-review-csharp
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices. Trigger phrases include "review this C# code", "check my C# for best practices", "analyze this C# class", "find issues in my C# code".
refactoring-csharp
Rename and refactor C# symbols in a .NET solution or multi-solution monorepo with a one-shot Roslyn CLI. Use when the user asks to rename a symbol, preview impact, update references across a solution, or refactor shared projects across several solutions.
resharper-clt
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: jb inspectcode; jb cleanupcode; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally…
roslynator
Use the open-source free Roslynator analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. USE FOR: Roslynator.Analyzers setup; Roslynator CLI checks or cleanup; C# linting, static analysis, and code-fix automation. DO NOT USE FOR: overlapping analyzer packs with no consolidation plan; formatting-only work owned by another…
stylecop-analyzers
Use the open-source free StyleCop.Analyzers package for naming, layout, documentation, and style rules in .NET projects. Use when a repo wants stricter style conventions than the SDK analyzers alone provide. USE FOR: the repo wants StyleCop.Analyzers; naming, layout, or documentation style needs stronger enforcement…