Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server --skill add-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/add-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/add-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/add-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/add-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/add-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 18 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03843 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01537 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00769 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00384 |
Grade A, and why
add-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- add-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 35 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 28 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- add-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
Tests use Vitest and createMockContext from @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/testing. If the repo already has tests, match the existing layout. If the repo has no existing tests, create a root tests/ directory that mirrors the src/ structure (e.g. tests/mcp-server/tools/definitions/echo.tool.test.ts for src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/echo.tool.ts).
For the full createMockContext API and testing patterns, read:
framework-skills/api-testing/SKILL.md
Steps
- Identify the target — which tool, resource, or service needs tests
- Read the source file — understand the handler's logic, input/output schemas, error paths, and which
ctxfeatures it uses - Create the test file in the repo's existing test layout — search for existing
*.test.tsfiles to confirm whether tests are colocated with source or under a roottests/directory - Write test cases covering happy path, error paths, and edge cases
- Run
bun run testto verify - Run
bun run devcheckto verify lint, types, and MCP definitions
Determining What to Test
Read the handler and identify:
| Aspect | Test Strategy |
|---|---|
| Happy path | Valid input → expected output. Include at least one. |
| Input variations | Optional fields omitted, defaults applied, boundary values |
| Error paths | Invalid state, missing resources, service failures → correct error thrown |
ctx.state usage |
Available on any mock context (tenant 'default' unless { tenantId } says otherwise). It runs the production storage path, so use storage-legal keys (cache/v1/abc, never cache:v1:abc) and assert TTL expiry with fake timers. |
ctx.requestInput / ctx.inputs |
Two rounds. First round: assert the handler throws the input-required signal (.rejects.toSatisfy(isInputRequiredSignal)), or catch it and assert on error.result.inputRequests. Second round: seed createMockContext({ inputResponses }) and assert the handler completes. Cover the decline/cancel branch too. A consent gate that redeems a ctx.state record also needs that record written into the second round's context, and a replay case showing the spent record asks again (see api-testing § Mock inputs). |
ctx.clientCapabilities |
When the handler asks only if the client declared a capability, seed createMockContext({ clientCapabilities }) with and without it and assert it asks in one case and falls through in the other. Seeding it also filters inputResponses to the declared kinds, as production does. |
ctx.signal |
Pass createMockContext({ signal: controller.signal }) and assert a long loop stops early rather than running to completion. |
ctx.fail (typed contract) |
Definitions with errors[] need fail attached to the mock ctx — createMockContext({ errors: myTool.errors }) does it for you. Assert on data.reason (stable per-contract entry), not just code. |
format function |
Test separately if defined — it's pure, no ctx needed. Verify it renders the IDs and fields the model needs, not just a count or title. For projection-style tools, test non-default field selections. |
| Sparse upstream payloads | For third-party API integrations, build a fixture with omitted fields. Assert normalized output still validates and format() preserves unknown values instead of inventing facts. |
| Form-client payloads | If handler has optional fields: test with empty-string inner values (form clients send "" instead of undefined). Assert handler doesn't break or produce invalid output. |
| Auth scopes | Not tested at handler level (framework enforces) — skip |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago Changed · +3 lines 290612698262
- 1mo ago Changed d4147ffbf280
- 1mo ago First seen · 318 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 9ff05d2f4834
add-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server (701 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,843 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
impl-validator
Independently check whether an implementation matches its stated goal and return PASS/WARN/FAIL with actionable issues. Use for second-opinion validation of an implementation or generated output.
pkm-session-end
Use when wrapping up a work session — creates devlog entry, captures undocumented decisions/research/debugging, audits link health of session work, and updates project index. Primarily used via the pkm-capture agent.
pkm-write
Use when writing to the vault — creating new notes (vaultwrite), editing existing notes (vaultedit, vaultappend, vaultupdatefrontmatter). Handles duplicate checking, link discovery, annotations, and index updates for new notes. Provides guidelines for modifications.
pkm-explore
Use when researching what the vault knows about a topic — performs graph + semantic exploration with gap analysis to map existing knowledge and find missing connections. Primarily used via the vault-explorer agent. Not for routine session-start context loading (hooks handle that).
triage-tasks
Use when you want to review and batch-update open vault task statuses for the current project or across all projects.
tackle-task
Use when starting work on a specific vault task, when a task title or path is mentioned, or when coming from triage output.