Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server --skill design-mcp-servergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/design-mcp-server)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/design-mcp-server"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/design-mcp-server/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/design-mcp-server"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/design-mcp-server.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 653 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 508 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.16085 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.08042 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.03217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01608 |
Grade A, and why
design-mcp-server scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 7 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 9 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 9 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 9 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 9 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 9 lines differ
- design-mcp-server — 100% identical, 9 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 719 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
- User says "I want to build a ___ MCP server"
- User has an API, database, or system they want to expose to LLMs
- User wants to plan tools before scaffolding
- Existing server needs a new capability area (design the addition, not just a single tool)
Do NOT use for single-tool additions — use add-tool directly.
Inputs
Gather before designing. Ask the user if not obvious from context:
- Domain — what system, API, or capability is this server wrapping? Or is the server providing internal capability with no external dependency (computation, text/code utilities, in-memory state)?
- Data sources / source of truth — APIs, databases, file systems, external services? Or is the server itself the source (in-memory state, pure computation, local-only utility, embedded model)?
- Target users — what will the LLM (and its human) be trying to accomplish?
- Scope constraints — read-only? write access? admin operations? what's off-limits?
If the domain has a public API, read its docs before designing. For internal-only servers, skip API research and go straight to user goals. Don't design from vibes either way.
Server scope and audience
Before committing to a server boundary, answer: what workflow does this server serve, and who is the audience?
The unit of a server is a user workflow, not an API. A single rich API can earn its own server when the audience is large and the API surface supports a full workflow (PubMed for literature research, SEC EDGAR for financial analysis, Shodan for internet-wide device intelligence). Multiple APIs should collapse into one server when they serve the same workflow from different angles — a "threat intelligence" server that aggregates VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, and GreyNoise is more useful than three separate servers because the user's goal is "assess this indicator," not "query VirusTotal."
Don't default to one-API-one-server. That's the right call when the API is deep enough and the audience is large enough, but it's not the starting point. The starting point is the workflow:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +5 lines 8e58c655352e
- 5d ago Changed 84044a901bd8
- 11d ago First seen · 714 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 27b9a61334d6
design-mcp-server is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server (675 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 16,085 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
knowledge-base-management
A lifecycle system for managing an Obsidian knowledge base, which is a folder of linked notes. It organizes raw material, AI-maintained wiki pages, and generated views into separate layers.
widget-authoring
Author or edit ThinkEx widgets, which are self-contained interactive HTML blocks inside documents. Use when the user explicitly asks for a widget, asks for interaction or live computation, or wants a document visual that ordinary blocks cannot express.
clerk-knowledge-patch
Use this guide when implementing, upgrading, or debugging Clerk authentication, authorization, Organizations, Billing, SDKs, components, or deployment architecture. Start with the migration notes, then open the matching reference.
consul-knowledge-patch
Use this skill when designing, configuring, upgrading, or troubleshooting Consul deployments whose behavior depends on recent discovery, service-mesh, gateway, Kubernetes, security, Enterprise, or operational changes.
anthropic-api-knowledge-patch
Use this skill when building or migrating integrations for the Messages API, hosted platform variants, Managed Agents, structured outputs, tools, streaming, prompt caching, model selection, or rate-limit handling. Treat the project's actual SDK types, API responses, and model metadata as authoritative when they differ…
apache-kafka-knowledge-patch
Use this skill when upgrading, configuring, extending, or operating Apache Kafka and its clients, Kafka Streams, Kafka Connect, MirrorMaker, KRaft, share groups, or tiered storage. Inspect the project's actual broker, client, metadata, and Java versions before applying version-dependent advice.