Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-server --skill add-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-server/add-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-server/add-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-server/add-test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00714 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00357 |
Grade A, and why
add-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to add-test — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 318 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
Tests use Vitest and createMockContext from @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/testing. If the repo already has tests, match the existing layout. If the repo has no existing tests, create a root tests/ directory that mirrors the src/ structure (e.g. tests/mcp-server/tools/definitions/echo.tool.test.ts for src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/echo.tool.ts).
For the full createMockContext API and testing patterns, read:
skills/api-testing/SKILL.md
Steps
- Identify the target — which tool, resource, or service needs tests
- Read the source file — understand the handler's logic, input/output schemas, error paths, and which
ctxfeatures it uses - Create the test file in the repo's existing test layout — search for existing
*.test.tsfiles to confirm whether tests are colocated with source or under a roottests/directory - Write test cases covering happy path, error paths, and edge cases
- Run
bun run testto verify - Run
bun run devcheckto verify lint, types, and MCP definitions
Determining What to Test
Read the handler and identify:
| Aspect | Test Strategy |
|---|---|
| Happy path | Valid input → expected output. Include at least one. |
| Input variations | Optional fields omitted, defaults applied, boundary values |
| Error paths | Invalid state, missing resources, service failures → correct error thrown |
ctx.state usage |
Available on any mock context (tenant 'default' unless { tenantId } says otherwise). It runs the production storage path, so use storage-legal keys (cache/v1/abc, never cache:v1:abc) and assert TTL expiry with fake timers. |
ctx.requestInput / ctx.inputs |
Two rounds. First round: assert the handler throws the input-required signal (.rejects.toSatisfy(isInputRequiredSignal)), or catch it and assert on error.result.inputRequests. Second round: seed createMockContext({ inputResponses }) and assert the handler completes. Cover the decline/cancel branch too. |
ctx.signal |
Pass createMockContext({ signal: controller.signal }) and assert a long loop stops early rather than running to completion. |
ctx.fail (typed contract) |
Definitions with errors[] need fail attached to the mock ctx — createMockContext({ errors: myTool.errors }) does it for you. Assert on data.reason (stable per-contract entry), not just code. |
format function |
Test separately if defined — it's pure, no ctx needed. Verify it renders the IDs and fields the model needs, not just a count or title. For projection-style tools, test non-default field selections. |
| Sparse upstream payloads | For third-party API integrations, build a fixture with omitted fields. Assert normalized output still validates and format() preserves unknown values instead of inventing facts. |
| Form-client payloads | If handler has optional fields: test with empty-string inner values (form clients send "" instead of undefined). Assert handler doesn't break or produce invalid output. |
| Auth scopes | Not tested at handler level (framework enforces) — skip |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 318 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 9ff05d2f4834
add-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/toolkit-mcp-server (18 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,571 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to add-test, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sap-abap-change-assurance
Assess an SAP transport before release by running ATC, ABAP Unit, and optional cross-system comparison, then produce JSON, SARIF, and JUnit evidence. Use when reviewing a transport, preparing a release gate, investigating a failed quality gate, or integrating SAP change checks into CI.
unit-test-bootstrapper
Analyzes source code files (Python, JS, TS) and auto-generates comprehensive, robust unit tests covering happy paths, edge cases, and exceptions.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
api-testing
Testing patterns for MCP tool/resource handlers using createMockContext and Vitest. Covers mock context options, handler testing, McpError assertions, format testing, Vitest config setup, and test isolation conventions.
test-generator
A test-writing helper that creates unit or integration tests from the code's actual behavior and contracts. Unit tests check small pieces of code, while integration tests check how real components work together.
test-quality
Write high-quality JUnit 5 tests with AssertJ assertions. Use when user says "add tests", "write tests", "improve test coverage", or when reviewing/creating test classes for Java code.