security-review

security-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from cybernetix-lab/moss-harness. It costs 36 tokens per session (3,032 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of security-review, MIT.

A code-review checklist for security-sensitive work such as login systems, user input, API endpoints, secrets, payments, and private data.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it while building or reviewing authentication, file uploads, APIs, payment features, secret handling, and third-party integrations.
Why use it?
It helps catch common security mistakes, such as putting passwords in source code or accepting unsafe input, before they become vulnerabilities.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it while building or reviewing authentication, file uploads, APIs, payment features, secret handling, and third-party integrations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add cybernetix-lab/moss-harness --skill security-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cybernetix-lab/moss-harness/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,032 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 98% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.03032
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.01516
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00606
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00303

Measured 11d ago against content hash 8cd029a9bdd8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

98% identical to security-review — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

integrations/skills/security-review/SKILL.md · 496 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 496 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Review Skill

This skill ensures all code follows security best practices and identifies potential vulnerabilities.

When to Activate

  • Implementing authentication or authorization
  • Handling user input or file uploads
  • Creating new API endpoints
  • Working with secrets or credentials
  • Implementing payment features
  • Storing or transmitting sensitive data
  • Integrating third-party APIs

Security Checklist

1. Secrets Management

FAIL: NEVER Do This
const apiKey = "sk-proj-xxxxx"  // Hardcoded secret
const dbPassword = "password123" // In source code
PASS: ALWAYS Do This
const apiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY
const dbUrl = process.env.DATABASE_URL

// Verify secrets exist
if (!apiKey) {
  throw new Error('OPENAI_API_KEY not configured')
}
Verification Steps
  • No hardcoded API keys, tokens, or passwords
  • All secrets in environment variables
  • .env.local in .gitignore
  • No secrets in git history
  • Production secrets in hosting platform (Vercel, Railway)

2. Input Validation

Always Validate User Input
import { z } from 'zod'

// Define validation schema
const CreateUserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
  age: z.number().int().min(0).max(150)
})

// Validate before processing
export async function createUser(input: unknown) {
  try {
    const validated = CreateUserSchema.parse(input)
    return await db.users.create(validated)
  } catch (error) {
    if (error instanceof z.ZodError) {
      return { success: false, errors: error.errors }
    }
    throw error
  }
}
File Upload Validation
function validateFileUpload(file: File) {
  // Size check (5MB max)
  const maxSize = 5 * 1024 * 1024
  if (file.size > maxSize) {
    throw new Error('File too large (max 5MB)')
  }

  // Type check
  const allowedTypes = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/gif']
  if (!allowedTypes.includes(file.type)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid file type')
  }

  // Extension check
  const allowedExtensions = ['.jpg', '.jpeg', '.png', '.gif']
  const extension = file.name.toLowerCase().match(/\.[^.]+$/)?.[0]
  if (!extension || !allowedExtensions.includes(extension)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid file extension')
  }

  return true
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 496 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 496 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 8cd029a9bdd8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cybernetix-lab/moss-harness (135 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 3,032 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to security-review, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.