CyberStrike is an open-source AI security harness that automates penetration testing by using language models as agents for reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and reporting. Security practitioners use it to test systems from a terminal, and the catalogue contains skills and settings for its workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill cis-aws-foundations-2.7git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CyberStrikeus/CyberStrikeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyberstrikeus/cyberstrike/cis-aws-foundations-2.7)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyberstrikeus/cyberstrike/cis-aws-foundations-2.7"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyberstrikeus/cyberstrike/cis-aws-foundations-2.7/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyberstrikeus/cyberstrike/cis-aws-foundations-2.7"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyberstrikeus/cyberstrike/cis-aws-foundations-2.7.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Privilege Escalation · line 70 Commands invoke sudo or root privileges. Verify this elevated access is necessary and justified.Fix: Avoid sudo/root unless strictly required. Prefer least-privilege patterns. If elevation is needed, document the justification and scope.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01146 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00573 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
cis-aws-foundations-2.7 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 121 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A c9117ae322a9
cis-aws-foundations-2.7 is a skill published in the GitHub repository CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike (2,654 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,146 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
securing-aws-lambda-execution-roles
Securing AWS Lambda execution roles by implementing least-privilege IAM policies, applying permission boundaries, restricting resource-based policies, using IAM Access Analyzer to validate permissions, and enforcing role scoping through SCPs.
detecting-aws-iam-privilege-escalation
Detect AWS IAM privilege escalation paths using boto3 and Cloudsplaining policy analysis to identify overly permissive policies, dangerous permission combinations, and least-privilege violations.
aws-review
Performs an AWS security posture review against the CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark v3.0.0. Auto-invoked when reviewing AWS infrastructure, IAM policies, S3 configurations, CloudTrail settings, VPC security groups, or RDS encryption. Walks through all five benchmark sections, evaluates each…
cloud-recon
Cloud infrastructure enumeration — AWS S3 buckets, Azure blob storage, GCP buckets, cloud metadata endpoints, IAM misconfigurations, CDN origin detection.
securing-aws-lambda-execution-roles
Securing AWS Lambda execution roles by implementing least-privilege IAM policies, applying permission boundaries, restricting resource-based policies, using IAM Access Analyzer to validate permissions, and enforcing role scoping through SCPs.
implementing-aws-iam-permission-boundaries
Configure IAM permission boundaries in AWS to delegate role creation to developers while enforcing maximum privilege limits set by the security team.