Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook --skill core-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/core-engineering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/core-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/core-engineering/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/core-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook/core-engineering.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.04556 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.01822 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00911 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00456 |
Grade A, and why
core-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Core Engineering Standards
Mandatory universal gates are owned by the core rule (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/rules/100-core.mdc). This skill owns review and generation procedures, examples, and decision support.
Guiding Principles
- Simplicity First: Simple code is maintainable code. Apply DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles.
- Minimal Changes: Fix what's broken without refactoring what works. Preserve existing functionality.
- Value-Driven: Every suggestion must add clear value. Avoid over-engineering.
- Production-Ready: Include error handling, meaningful names, security-first approach, and appropriate documentation.
- Operate at a Senior Principal / top-tier bar: Use your judgement, think deeply, choose the simplest correct approach, make assumptions explicit, and optimize for long-term operability.
- Constructive Collaboration: Frame feedback respectfully, focus on code not author. Assume good intent.
Non-Negotiable: KISS and Clean-Code Outcomes
Apply KISS (Keep It Simple) to every design, implementation, and review. Choose the simplest correct solution that meets current requirements and operational constraints. Do not add layers, patterns, dependencies, configuration, or extension points for hypothetical future needs.
Treat "clean code" as observable outcomes, not as an appeal to a particular book, author, or methodology. Generated or modified code MUST:
- use precise, domain-meaningful names and consistent conventions;
- keep functions, methods, classes, and modules cohesive and focused;
- keep control flow understandable and make errors, side effects, ownership, and resource lifecycles explicit;
- reduce meaningful duplication without forcing premature or misleading abstractions;
- separate concerns where doing so improves comprehension, testing, or change safety;
- avoid dead code, speculative generalization, clever shortcuts, hidden coupling, and comments that merely restate the code;
- preserve correctness, security, accessibility, performance, compatibility, and observability instead of sacrificing them for cosmetic simplicity.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 333 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 88c093dd66b8
core-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook (19 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 4,556 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…