Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dalroot/agentic-seo --skill backlink-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dalroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/backlink-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/backlink-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/backlink-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/backlink-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/backlink-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00745 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
backlink-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Off-Page: Backlink Analysis
Guides backlink profile analysis: assessing quality, identifying issues, and planning improvements.
When invoking: On first use, if helpful, open with 1–2 sentences on what this skill covers and why it matters, then provide the main output. On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip, go directly to the main output.
Scope (Off-Page SEO)
- Backlink audit: Analyze profile; toxic links; competitive analysis
- Authority Score: Monitor domain/page authority; referring domains
Initial Assessment
Identify:
- Domain: Site to analyze
- Tool access: SEO tools (e.g. Ahrefs, Semrush) or free alternatives
- Goals: Audit for issues, competitive analysis, or growth planning
Key Metrics
| Metric | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Referring domains | Number of unique sites linking |
| Backlinks | Total number of links |
| Domain Rating (DR) / Domain Authority (DA) | Domain strength score |
| Anchor text distribution | Mix of branded, generic, exact match |
| Link velocity | Rate of new links over time |
Analysis Framework
1. Quality Assessment
- Relevance: Do links come from related niches?
- Authority: Are referring domains trusted?
- Context: Editorial vs. footer/sidebar links?
- Anchor text: Natural or over-optimized?
2. Risk Signals
| Signal | Action |
|---|---|
| Toxic links | Consider disavow (use cautiously) |
| Spammy anchors | Diversify anchor text naturally |
| Link schemes | Remove or disavow |
| Sudden spike | Investigate; may trigger penalty |
3. Competitive Comparison
- Compare backlink profile to competitors
- Identify link gaps (sites linking to competitors but not you)
- Find link opportunities from competitor backlinks
- See competitor-research for full methodology
Disavow File
- Use only when necessary (manual penalty, toxic links)
- Submit via Google Search Console (see google-search-console for Links report and disavow submission)
- Caution: Over-disavowing can harm; use sparingly
- References: Google Disavow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 82 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A d1ccb58e8cf1
backlink-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository dalroot/agentic-seo (25 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo
Deterministic LLM-first SEO audits for websites, blog posts, and GitHub repositories. Use this when the user asks to "perform SEO analysis", "run SEO audit", "analyze SEO", "check technical SEO", "review schema", "Core Web Vitals", "E-E-A-T", "hreflang", "GEO", "AEO", or GitHub repository SEO optimization. For…
github
When the user wants to use GitHub for SEO, parasite SEO, GEO, open source marketing, README optimization, or curated Awesome lists. Also use when the user mentions "GitHub," "GitHub SEO," "GitHub parasite SEO," "GitHub GEO," "awesome list," "GitHub README," "profile README," "pinned repositories," "Trending,"…
schema-markup
When the user wants to add or optimize structured data (Schema.org, JSON-LD). Also use when the user mentions "schema," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich results," "rich snippets," "Google rich snippets," "featured snippet schema," "add schema to page," "missing structured data," "schema validation error," "Schema…
grokipedia-recommendations
When the user wants to add recommendations, links, or content to Grokipedia. Also use when the user mentions "Grokipedia," "GEO wiki," "AI encyclopedia," "suggest Grokipedia article," "Grokipedia citation," "Grokipedia listing," "AI search citation," "GEO visibility," or "Grokipedia optimization." For multi-platform…
google-search-console
When the user wants to analyze Google Search Console data, use the GSC API, or interpret search performance. Also use when the user mentions "GSC," "Search Console," "indexing report," "Core Web Vitals," "Enhancements," "Insights report," "search performance," "search queries," "search performance report," "URL…
brand-visual-generator
When the user wants to define, audit, or apply visual identity (typography, colors, spacing, design tokens, frontend aesthetics). Also use when the user mentions "brand style guide," "visual identity," "design system," "typography," "color palette," "brand guidelines," "AI brand aesthetics," "brand colors," "font…