Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dalroot/agentic-seo --skill grokipediagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dalroot/agentic-seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dalroot/agentic-seo/grokipedia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.03824 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.01530 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00765 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00382 |
Grade A, and why
grokipedia-recommendations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 264 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Platforms: Grokipedia
Guides adding recommendations, links, or content to Grokipedia. Grokipedia is a high-authority platform for parasite SEO and GEO (AI citation visibility). See parasite-seo for parasite SEO strategy. Grokipedia is xAI's AI-generated encyclopedia; ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI tools cite it.
On each invocation: On first use in the conversation, output the complete response (Introduction, Importance, Methods, Rules, Avoid, Action). On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip (e.g., "just do it", "skip intro", "I already know"), go directly to Action.
Growth channel value: Grokipedia is worth investing in as a growth channel for GEO and backlinks. It is positioned as a potential future Wikipedia—Wikipedia's traffic and domain authority are well-established; Grokipedia, though newer, is already being cited by major AI products and its citation share is rising.
Scope
- Suggest Article: Request new topics; Grok AI reviews and may create
- Suggest Edit: Propose corrections or additions to existing articles
- Report Error: Flag factual inaccuracies, outdated info, citation errors
- Parasite SEO / GEO: Use Grokipedia's authority for backlinks and AI citation (see parasite-seo for strategy)
What Is Grokipedia
- Platform: AI-generated online encyclopedia by xAI (Grok); launched October 2025
- Content: ~6M+ articles; AI-generated, fact-checked by Grok; users cannot edit directly
- GEO relevance: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini, Copilot cite Grokipedia for factual queries
- Parasite SEO: High-authority domain; links from Grokipedia pass authority; content placement for distributed visibility (see parasite-seo)
Why It Matters (Citation Data)
| Metric | Note |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT citations | ~263K responses cited Grokipedia from 13.6M prompts; ~95K individual pages. Wikipedia: 2.9M responses—quite a way off, but impressive for how new they are. (Source: SEO tools, Jan 2026) |
| Citation share trend | ~0.01–0.02% of ChatGPT citations/day; steadily increasing since mid-Nov 2025 |
| AI product adoption | Spike in Google AI (Gemini, AI Overviews, AI Mode) and Copilot in Dec 2025; ChatGPT cites Grokipedia most |
| Use case | Niche, obscure, highly specific factual queries; ChatGPT often features Grokipedia as one of the first sources cited |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 264 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 60cc6c9ca056
grokipedia-recommendations is a skill published in the GitHub repository dalroot/agentic-seo (25 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 3,824 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo
Deterministic LLM-first SEO audits for websites, blog posts, and GitHub repositories. Use this when the user asks to "perform SEO analysis", "run SEO audit", "analyze SEO", "check technical SEO", "review schema", "Core Web Vitals", "E-E-A-T", "hreflang", "GEO", "AEO", or GitHub repository SEO optimization. For…
github
When the user wants to use GitHub for SEO, parasite SEO, GEO, open source marketing, README optimization, or curated Awesome lists. Also use when the user mentions "GitHub," "GitHub SEO," "GitHub parasite SEO," "GitHub GEO," "awesome list," "GitHub README," "profile README," "pinned repositories," "Trending,"…
schema-markup
When the user wants to add or optimize structured data (Schema.org, JSON-LD). Also use when the user mentions "schema," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich results," "rich snippets," "Google rich snippets," "featured snippet schema," "add schema to page," "missing structured data," "schema validation error," "Schema…
grokipedia-recommendations
When the user wants to add recommendations, links, or content to Grokipedia. Also use when the user mentions "Grokipedia," "GEO wiki," "AI encyclopedia," "suggest Grokipedia article," "Grokipedia citation," "Grokipedia listing," "AI search citation," "GEO visibility," or "Grokipedia optimization." For multi-platform…
google-search-console
When the user wants to analyze Google Search Console data, use the GSC API, or interpret search performance. Also use when the user mentions "GSC," "Search Console," "indexing report," "Core Web Vitals," "Enhancements," "Insights report," "search performance," "search queries," "search performance report," "URL…
brand-visual-generator
When the user wants to define, audit, or apply visual identity (typography, colors, spacing, design tokens, frontend aesthetics). Also use when the user mentions "brand style guide," "visual identity," "design system," "typography," "color palette," "brand guidelines," "AI brand aesthetics," "brand colors," "font…