Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear/main/.claude/skills/validate-workflow/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bearWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear/validate-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear/validate-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear/validate-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear/validate-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear/validate-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01962 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00785 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00392 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
validate-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Validate Workflow
Validates workflow YAML files and the skill SKILL.md docs that reference them.
Catches stale CLI commands, wrong --params syntax, and stage name drift before
they reach CI or confuse agents at runtime.
When to Use
- Before committing new or modified workflow YAML files
- After renaming or adding stages (stage references in skills go stale)
- After adding
--paramsto skill docs (easy to mis-spell trigger param names) - User says "validate workflow", "check workflow commands", "lint workflows"
- As part of a PR review when
workflows/or.claude/skills/changed
Two Layers of Validation
Layer 1 — Workflow YAML structural + command lint
# Lint one file (structure only, fast)
./bin/workflow lint workflows/code/code-review.yaml
# Lint with CLI command probing (validates ./bin/<cli> <sub> references in stage descriptions)
./bin/workflow lint workflows/code/code-review.yaml --check-commands
# Strict mode — warnings become errors
./bin/workflow lint workflows/code/code-review.yaml --check-commands --strict
# YAML output for programmatic use (this is the default format)
./bin/workflow lint workflows/code/code-review.yaml --check-commands --format yaml
Shared fragments are not runnable standalone — they carry a top-level fragment: true
key and must be validated with the dedicated subcommand:
./bin/workflow validate-fragment workflows/shared/expand-coverage.yaml
Layer 2 — Skill doc correctness checks (manual)
Skill docs reference workflow files in two ways the linter cannot check:
./bin/workflow run <path> --params key=value— param names must matchtrigger.paramsin the YAML- Stage name tables — must match stage names in the compiled DAG (including fragment prefixes)
Run these checks manually:
# Extract trigger.params from a workflow
python3 -I -c "
import yaml
d = yaml.safe_load(open('workflows/code/code-review.yaml'))
print('\n'.join((d.get('trigger') or {}).get('params', {})))
"
# List all stage names after fragment expansion (compiled DAG).
# Stage names live under groups[].stages as comma-joined strings — a bare
# `grep name:` would match the workflow name and warning keys instead.
./bin/workflow compile workflows/code/code-review.yaml --format yaml 2>/dev/null | python3 -I -c "
import sys, yaml
d = yaml.safe_load(sys.stdin)
for g in d.get('groups', []):
for s in str(g.get('stages', '')).split(','):
if s.strip(): print(s.strip())
"
# Extract --params keys from a skill doc (BSD grep on macOS has no -P; use -oE)
grep -oE '\-\-params [a-z_]+' .claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 190 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 525ce6a2c8b4
validate-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository dancing-bear-show/dancing-bear (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,962 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
validate-workflow compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| validate-workflowdancing-bear-show/dancing-bear | Skill | 7 | yesterday | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| gogolafkfreund/nixos_config | Skill | 32 | yesterday | GPL-3.0 | A | 125 | Claude Code, Codex |
| google-workspace-authbobmatnyc/claude-mpm | Skill | 158 | 2mo ago | none | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| critiquegoogle-gemini/gemini-cli | Skill | 109k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 23 | Gemini CLI |
| rea-ci-tests-auditmorluto/rea | Skill | 443k | today | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code, Codex |
| atmos-hookscloudposse/atmos | Skill | 1.4k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| atmos-modernizationcloudposse/atmos | Skill | 1.4k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 36 | Claude Code |