Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DANG-ai/SKILLER --skill evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DANG-ai/SKILLERWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dang-ai/skiller/evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dang-ai/skiller/evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dang-ai/skiller/evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dang-ai/skiller/evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dang-ai/skiller/evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.04431 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01772 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00886 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00443 |
Grade A, and why
evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 259 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A fdeba7c008cd
evoskill-skilllearnbench-global-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository DANG-ai/SKILLER (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 4,431 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
redamon-testing
How RedAmon tests actually run and how to author them: the per-file Docker gate, the unit/integration/live tiers, and the failure modes that make a green run a lie. Trigger: editing any test.py, .test.ts(x) or tests/.sh; a test that is red, skipped or xfailed; a request to "run the tests", "make it green" or check…
pr-review
Review Nemotron pull requests for code correctness, instructions that match the implementation, first-user setup, and reproducible notebooks and cookbooks.
codex-autoresearch
Triage improvement work and run or resume accepted measured loops in a local project. Architecture, documentation, UX, product study, open research, taste, and one-shot fixes stay direct unless the user explicitly requests repeated measurement with a complete experiment contract.
building
Use when writing production code test-first: the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, false-RED detection, vertical slicing, scope escalation, test process discipline, and code generation patterns.
risk-based-code-review
Use when reviewing or verifying software changes before completion, release, merge, deployment, or acceptance, especially when the appropriate test depth is unclear or security, data, migrations, external interfaces, infrastructure, or user-visible behavior may be affected.
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.