RedAmon is an AI framework that connects reconnaissance, exploitation, and post-exploitation activities into an automated security-testing pipeline, while organizing findings and proposing code fixes. It is for authorized penetration testing, security research, and education. The catalogue entries provide skills and instructions for working with the framework.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samugit83/redamonnpx agentmods add skills/samugit83/redamon/redamon-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samugit83/redamon/redamon-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samugit83/redamon/redamon-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samugit83/redamon/redamon-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samugit83/redamon/redamon-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samugit83/redamon/redamon-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 55 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.02009 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00804 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00402 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
redamon-testing scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
against the source (`recon/tests/test_arjun.py` broke when `subprocess.run` How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
- Writing or fixing a test anywhere in the repo, or deciding where a new test goes.
- A test is red/skipped/xfailed and you must decide whether it is real.
- You were asked to run the suite or verify a change "works".
The repo-wide rule "never validate with host pytest, use the Docker gate" lives
in the root AGENTS.md CRITICAL RULES; this skill is everything
after that: isolation, tiers, and how to write a test that asserts something.
Critical Rules
- NEVER run
pytestacross a whole tree in one process. Many tests stublangchain/langgraphintosys.modulesand bake tool objects against a fake@toolat import time, so whichever file collects first decides for all of them. You get phantom failures in files you never touched (classicallya coroutine was expected, got <MagicMock>). Run./redamon.sh test, or one file / node id. The gate exists for this: tooling/scripts/pytest_isolated.py runs each FILE in its own subprocess. - NEVER "fix" source because a test went red in a multi-file run. Re-run that one file in isolation first; if it passes alone the failure was pollution, not a bug.
- NEVER
print("SKIP..."); returnto skip a test. pytest records that as PASSED while asserting nothing. Useself.skipTest(...)inside aTestCaseorpytest.skip(...)in a bare function. - NEVER read a green gate as "the live checks passed". A self-skipping test
that needs a service prints SKIP and exits 0, and the gate containers have no
Neo4j, so the live-graph schema checks in
recon/tests/test_schema_catalog.py
SKIP in every CI run. Their hermetic counterparts in
recon/tests/test_graph_writes_documented.py
do run. Neither sees everything: the code scan cannot see the ~22 labels
written with
SET n += $props(the names are built in Python and appear in no file), and the live graph cannot see a feature this deployment never ran. After a schema change, run the live one against a stack before believing it. - NEVER rewrite an assertion so it passes. If a test reveals a real bug, mark
it
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True, reason=...)and say so. Tests must not enshrine bugs. - NEVER put a recon test in the root tests/ folder. Root
tests/runs in the agent image; recon files there must be listed in_ROOT_RECON_TESTSat redamon.sh:4898 or they run against the wrong image and fail on imports. New recon tests go in recon/tests/. - NEVER add a third-party import to a test without checking it is in the section
image. Only
pytest,pytest-cov,pytest-xdist,pytest-asyncio(requirements-test.txt) are guaranteed; anything else errors the whole file at collection. Preferunittest.mockand the stdlib. - ALWAYS assert behaviour, not execution. For a tool wrapper, assert both
the parsed result and the command that was built. Verify the patch target
against the source (
recon/tests/test_arjun.pybroke whensubprocess.runbecamePopenand the mocks kept targetingrun). - ALWAYS make a test that needs a stack, binary, service or git HEAD skip cleanly. A hard failure on a missing prerequisite is a bug in the test.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +5 lines 37293b8d69fe
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines e4d7c0b0b9b9
- 1mo ago Changed 57a57e8afdd8
- 1mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 111794085296
redamon-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository samugit83/redamon (3,133 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 2,009 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-sandbox
Agent skill for sandbox - invoke with $agent-sandbox.
codex-autoresearch
Triage improvement work and run or resume accepted measured loops in a local project. Architecture, documentation, UX, product study, open research, taste, and one-shot fixes stay direct unless the user explicitly requests repeated measurement with a complete experiment contract.
file-upload-testing
File upload vulnerability testing — webshells, bypass, path traversal.
xss-testing
Detect and exploit cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in web applications.
race-condition-testing
Race condition and TOCTOU exploitation — parallel request attacks.
sqli-testing
Detect and exploit SQL injection vulnerabilities in web application parameters.