dual-llm-review

dual-llm-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from danielgap/openclaw-planitor. It costs 0 tokens per session (976 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review process that asks two different language models to assess important work independently, then combines their findings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for strategy, business-building, and other key pipeline stages that need contrasting perspectives, including internal and external SWOT analysis.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that one model's blind spots or assumptions go unnoticed during critical planning and evaluation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for strategy, business-building, and other key pipeline stages that need contrasting perspectives, including internal and external SWOT analysis.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add danielgap/openclaw-planitor --skill dual-llm-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielgap/openclaw-planitor

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dual-llm-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dual-llm-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielgap/openclaw-planitor/dual-llm-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 976 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00976
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00488
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00195
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00098

Measured 10d ago against content hash 27e5153899b5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dual-llm-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/dual-llm-review/SKILL.md · 113 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dual-LLM Review Skill

Propósito

Evaluación adversarial usando dos modelos LLM diferentes en paralelo para fases críticas del pipeline. Reemplaza la dependencia en Modelo A y Modelo B como agentes externos.

Filosofía

Un solo modelo tiene sesgos ciegos. Dos modelos independientes, con la misma información, generan perspectivas complementarias que se fusionan en una evaluación más robusta.

Configuración

Modelos requeridos

Rol Modelo Propósito
Reviewer A Modelo principal del agente Evaluación desde perspectiva analítica
Reviewer B Modelo secundario (diferente provider) Evaluación desde perspectiva alternativa

Regla: Los dos modelos deben ser de providers diferentes (ej: GLM + GPT, Claude + Gemini).

Si solo hay un modelo disponible

  • Usar el mismo modelo con dos prompts diferentes (perspectiva optimista vs pesimista)
  • Advertir en el reporte que no hubo dual-LLM real

Fases Dual-LLM

Fase 5: Strategy

  • Reviewer A: DAFO desde perspectiva interna (fortalezas/debilidades)
  • Reviewer B: DAFO desde perspectiva externa (oportunidades/amenazas)
  • Fusión: DAFO completo + estrategia de posicionamiento

Fase 6: Build

  • Reviewer A: Redacción del plan con enfoque conservador
  • Reviewer B: Redacción del plan con enfoque ambicioso
  • Fusión: Plan equilibrado con rango de escenarios

Fase 8: Judge

  • Reviewer A: Evaluación técnica (datos, cálculos, coherencia)
  • Reviewer B: Evaluación estratégica (viabilidad, timing, riesgos)
  • Fusión: JUDGE-REPORT con score único y veredicto

Protocolo de Ejecución

1. Preparar input idéntico para ambos reviewers
2. Ejecutar Reviewer A → output_a
3. Ejecutar Reviewer B → output_b
4. Comparar outputs:
   a. Puntos de acuerdo → Alta confianza
   b. Puntos de desacuerdo → Flag para revisión manual
   c. Puntos únicos de cada reviewer → Incorporar si aportan valor
5. Generar output fusionado
6. Documentar discrepancias en sección "Dual-LLM Notes"

Read the full file on GitHub · 113 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 113 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 27e5153899b5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dual-llm-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository danielgap/openclaw-planitor (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 976 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.