Interview

An evidence-based review conversation about your personal goals, identity, projects, and current state. It compares written claims with observed data such as sleep, app use, work records, code activity, and expenses.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to refresh personal context, review progress toward an ideal state, and update files after checking current evidence.
Why use it?
Personal planning files become outdated as circumstances change, while stale information can continue guiding decisions. This review highlights contradictions and helps confirm or correct the records.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/danielmiessler/lifeos/interview
Any agent
npx skills add danielmiessler/LifeOS --skill interview
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielmiessler/LifeOS

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 188 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,761 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00188 $0.01761
Opus 5 $0.00094 $0.00881
Sonnet 5 $0.00038 $0.00352
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00176

Measured 2d ago against content hash f693ebad80fc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Interview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

LifeOS/install/skills/Interview/SKILL.md · 72 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Interview — constitutional-context peer conversation

What It Does

Interview reads your constitutional files — TELOS, identity, projects, system prompt, architecture — plus the CURRENT_STATE and IDEAL_STATE dimension files, checks their freshness, and confronts stale claims with observed data: Oura sleep/HRV/RHR, Conduit creation-vs-consumption time, the work registry, git cadence, and the expense ledger. The conversation opens with the sharpest claim-vs-evidence contradiction, drafts corrections you ratify, offers to populate the files the machinery can write, and closes with an ideal-state review grounded in the measured gap. On a fresh install it falls back to first-time setup. The 🎤 statusline chip (fed by InterviewDue.ts, daily launchd refresh) says when one is due; wrapping with --mark-done clears the cadence reason, and the skew/staleness reasons clear as their files are actually reviewed.

The Problem

The files that define who you are and what you're working toward drift out of date the moment you stop looking at them. A goal you set in January may be done, dead, or still right — but nobody re-reads the whole TELOS to find out, so the context the system runs on slowly rots. The usual fix is a blank "what's your mission?" prompt, which ignores everything already on file and makes you repeat yourself. This skill reads what's there first, flags only what's gone stale, and asks "still right?" instead of starting from zero.

How It Works

The skill reads the constitutional files via the freshness tooling, scores each section's staleness, and routes to the right workflow — a check-in on a populated system, or first-time setup on a fresh one. Staleness is a priority signal, not a failure flag.

Workflow Routing

Workflow Trigger File
ContextCheckin default /interview on a populated system; "context check-in", "telos check-in", "what's stale", "how are we doing on…", "still on…", "review context" Workflows/ContextCheckin.md
Phase0Setup fresh install; DA name still reads "LifeOS"; PRINCIPAL_IDENTITY still reads "User"; PROJECTS sample-row only; .env missing required keys Workflows/Phase0Setup.md
TelosCheckin (deprecated stub) back-compat for explicit "telos checkin" routing Workflows/TelosCheckin.md (redirects to ContextCheckin)

Read the full file on GitHub · 72 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 72 lines · 188 tokens per session scan A f693ebad80fc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Interview is a skill published in the GitHub repository danielmiessler/LifeOS (18,798 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 188 tokens to every session and 1,761 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

mobile-harness

Portable Android and iOS device-control harness for agents. Use when an agent needs to control or automate Android/iOS devices — tap, swipe, screenshot, app control — locally (ADB/Portal/Simulator) or on Mobilerun cloud devices.

droidrun/mobile-harness · 54 tokens

macos-harness

Control a whole Mac from one persistent Python session with screenshots, PID-targeted input, an animated virtual pointer, targeted Apple Accessibility, Apple Events, Browser Harness CDP, and filesystem access. Use for native, Electron, browser, dialog, file, or cross-app tasks without moving the physical cursor or…

Zfinix/aster · 71 tokens

aster-cli

Guidance for using the aster CLI to work in a codebase with an AI agent: chat and edit code, run AI code reviews, apply fixes, and manage sessions, memory, and skills. Use when running or designing aster commands, reviewing a diff or PR with aster, or when the user mentions aster review, aster chat, aster fix, or…

Zfinix/aster · 85 tokens

aster-config

Reference for aster.yaml, covering review models, analyzers, focus areas, include/exclude globs, minconfidence, and the permissions block that gates edits. Use when creating or editing aster.yaml, choosing hypothesis/verify models, enabling semgrep or ast-grep, or configuring edit permissions.

Zfinix/aster · 65 tokens

aster-chat-sessions

Drive aster chat programmatically and manage sessions and memory: one-shot --print/--json answers, --messages-json for caller-owned history, --continue and --session persistence, --allow-edits gating, and the sessions/memory commands. Use when scripting aster chat, integrating it into an editor or agent, or inspecting…

Zfinix/aster · 74 tokens

aster-fix-workflow

Pipe aster review findings into aster fix to generate and apply patches safely, using review --json, fix --findings-json, dry-run inspection, --apply, and permission gating. Use when asked to auto-fix review findings, apply aster's suggested edits, or build a review-then-fix pipeline.

Zfinix/aster · 71 tokens