Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DanielT777/sieve --skill address-sieve-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DanielT777/sieveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielt777/sieve/address-sieve-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielt777/sieve/address-sieve-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielt777/sieve/address-sieve-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielt777/sieve/address-sieve-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielt777/sieve/address-sieve-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.00459 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
address-sieve-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Address Sieve Review
Load the review
- Resolve the current workspace root with
git rev-parse --show-toplevel; fall back to the current directory outside Git. - Search
~/.sieve/workspaces/*/workspace.jsonand select the entry whoseworkspacePathresolves to that root. - Read the sibling
annotations.jsonfile. If it is absent or has no unresolved annotations, tell the user that no Sieve feedback is waiting. - Treat
startLineandendLineas zero-based.fileUriis the absolute target file. MissingsourceIdmeans current working-tree changes;checkpoint(changes since the last review) also points at the file as it is now in the working tree.
Address the feedback
- Before the first edit, run
sh scripts/checkpoint.sh <dir>from this skill's directory, where<dir>is the folder holding theannotations.jsonyou read. Sieve then shows the user only the changes you make from here. If it fails, carry on and say so at the end. - Process annotations where
resolvedisfalse, oldest first, unless the user narrows the scope. - Inspect the target file and nearby code. Lines may have shifted, so verify context before editing.
- Make the smallest change that addresses the comment. Treat
explainas a question unless a code change is clearly requested, and add tests fortestannotations when applicable. - Run the smallest relevant checks after editing.
- Apart from the checkpoint that script writes, do not edit files under
~/.sieve; Sieve remains the source of truth and the user resolves annotations there.
Finish with a compact list of annotations addressed, skipped, or needing clarification.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +1 lines ab3161af82cf
- 2mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 48ada68af49c
address-sieve-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository DanielT777/sieve (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 459 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
address-sieve-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| address-sieve-reviewDanielT777/sieve | Skill | 11 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 80 | Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |