Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danielvm-git/bigpowers --skill request-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielvm-git/bigpowers/request-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielvm-git/bigpowers/request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielvm-git/bigpowers/request-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielvm-git/bigpowers/request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielvm-git/bigpowers/request-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 3 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 113 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01397 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00559 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
request-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Request Review
Dispatch fresh reviewer agents with clean contexts. Reviewers have no shared state — they find what the coding agent missed.
Target (argument)
If an argument was passed after /request-review (e.g. /request-review abc1234 or /request-review HEAD~3..HEAD), use it as the diff target when building the reviewer brief:
git diff <arg> # range: abc..def, HEAD~3..HEAD
git show <arg> # single commit: abc1234
If no argument was given, review uncommitted working-tree changes.
Distinct from audit-code: audit-code is self-review (internal). This skill dispatches external agents.
Solo developer note: Reviewer agents replace the human reviewer.
Run audit-code first. Don't waste reviewer attention on hygiene issues you could have caught yourself.
Santa Method — Dual-Blind AND Gate (e45s07)
Use two independent reviewers (Reviewer A and Reviewer B) with no shared context between them or the coding agent.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Reviewers | 2 (mandatory) |
MAX_REVIEW_ITERATIONS |
5 (hard cap — e45s28; iteration 6 forbidden) |
| Pass rule | AND-gate — both reviewers must pass independently |
| Blindness | Neither reviewer sees the other's report until both complete |
Iteration loop (max MAX_REVIEW_ITERATIONS):
- Dispatch Reviewer A and Reviewer B in parallel with identical briefs but separate contexts.
- Collect both reports. Each categorizes findings: must-fix / should-fix / consider.
- AND-gate: If either reviewer has must-fix findings → FAIL round. Run
respond-review, fix, re-dispatch both reviewers. - If both pass (zero must-fix, score ≥ 94% each) → review complete.
- After 5 iterations without dual pass → stop; report "Review cap exhausted (5/5). Human decision required." Do not merge.
HARD GATE — Single-reviewer pass is insufficient. Partial agreement does not satisfy the AND-gate.
Process
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +11 lines 9b0290fbb5f7
- 2mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A ab877bded8e6
request-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository danielvm-git/bigpowers (287 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,397 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
request-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| request-reviewdanielvm-git/bigpowers | Skill | 287 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 56 | Claude Code, Codex |
| code-review-excellencewshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code |
| multi-reviewer-patternswshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| ponytail-reviewDietrichGebert/ponytail | Skill | 186k | 8d ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |
| sipLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code |
| hateLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 79 | Claude Code |