Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dannote/dot-pi --skill dont-anger-mariogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dannote/dot-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dannote/dot-pi/dont-anger-mario)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dannote/dot-pi/dont-anger-mario"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dannote/dot-pi/dont-anger-mario/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dannote/dot-pi/dont-anger-mario"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dannote/dot-pi/dont-anger-mario.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 108 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00855 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
dont-anger-mario scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Don't Anger Mario
Use this skill before opening an issue or contribution proposal in earendil-works/pi.
Rules
- Read
CONTRIBUTING.mdfirst. - Use an official issue template; blank issues are disabled.
- Keep it short. If it does not fit on one screen, it is too long.
- Write in the user's own voice, not corporate/AI slop.
- Be concrete: what, why, and optionally how.
- Do not submit automatically.
- Before submitting, ask the user to confirm they carefully read the exact final draft and explicitly approve posting it.
- If proposing a change, use Contribution Proposal rather than Bug Report.
- If reporting a bug, include minimal repro and version.
- If opening a PR, only proceed after maintainer approval (
lgtmfor PRs;lgtmiis issues only). - Do not send agent-only PRs. If the user cannot explain the change without the agent, stop.
Safe workflow
- Inspect templates and contributing docs:
gh api repos/earendil-works/pi/contents/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE --jq '.[].name'
gh api repos/earendil-works/pi/contents/CONTRIBUTING.md --jq .content | base64 --decode
- Draft the issue body in
/tmp, never inline long Markdown through shell quoting:
cat > /tmp/pi-issue.md <<'EOF'
### What do you want to change?
...
### Why?
...
### How? (optional)
...
EOF
-
Show the exact final title and body to the user.
-
Ask for explicit approval with this wording:
Please read the draft carefully. Do you explicitly approve me posting this issue/proposal as written?
Do not proceed on vague approval like "ok" if the user has not seen the exact final draft.
- Create only after explicit approval:
gh issue create \
--repo earendil-works/pi \
--template contribution.yml \
--title "Short concrete title" \
--body-file /tmp/pi-issue.md
Extra caution from prior tracker behavior
Known maintainer reactions that shape this workflow:
- Auto-close gate is intentional; maintainers review closed issues later.
- GitHub Actions outages can let the issue/PR gate fail and flood the repo.
- Maintainers dislike agent-only PRs because they take time to review and are often broken.
- "Clanker misunderstood the code" is a real failure mode; verify the claim before drafting.
- A label/comment like
possibly-openclaw-clankeris a warning sign: shorten, verify, and make the human reasoning obvious.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A b9a27a457ee2
dont-anger-mario is a skill published in the GitHub repository dannote/dot-pi (57 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 855 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
dont-anger-mario compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dont-anger-mariodannote/dot-pi | Skill | 57 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| a0-developmentagent0ai/agent-zero | Skill | 20k | yesterday | none | A | 24 | Claude Code, Codex |
| temporal-developertemporalio/skill-temporal-developer | Skill | 236 | yesterday | MIT | A | 173 | Claude Code, Codex |
| cafleethimkt/cafleet | Skill | 56 | yesterday | MIT | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| anycap-human-interactionanycap-ai/anycap | Skill | 50 | 16d ago | MIT | A | 190 | Claude Code |
| anycap-media-productionanycap-ai/anycap | Skill | 50 | 16d ago | MIT | A | 167 | Claude Code |
| anycap-blog-productionanycap-ai/anycap | Skill | 50 | 16d ago | MIT | A | 143 | Claude Code, Codex |