Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add darellchua2/opencode-config-template --skill git-issue-plan-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/darellchua2/opencode-config-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/darellchua2/opencode-config-template/git-issue-plan-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/darellchua2/opencode-config-template/git-issue-plan-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/darellchua2/opencode-config-template/git-issue-plan-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/darellchua2/opencode-config-template/git-issue-plan-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/darellchua2/opencode-config-template/git-issue-plan-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 119 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 318 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 343 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.03721 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01488 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00744 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00372 |
Grade A, and why
git-issue-plan-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 538 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
What I do
I implement a standardized GitHub issue creation and planning workflow:
- Gather Issue Requirements: Prompt user for structured issue description following industry best practices
- Determine Issue Scope: Ask if issue needs to be broken into sub-issues
- Create GitHub Issue: Use GitHub CLI to create issue with appropriate labels
- Create Git Branch: Generate branch from issue number (e.g.,
GIT-123) - Generate PLAN file: Create comprehensive plan with phases and todo list in
PLANS/directory - Commit and Push: Commit PLAN file with semantic formatting and push to remote
- Prompt Execution: Ask user if they want to proceed with plan execution
Framework Skills Used
This workflow delegates to these framework skills for specialized functionality:
| Skill | Purpose | Used In |
|---|---|---|
git-issue-labeler |
Intelligent label assessment and assignment | Step 3 |
git-semantic-commits |
Conventional commit message formatting | Step 7 |
git-issue-updater |
Progress updates to GitHub issues | Step 8 |
When to use me
Use this workflow when:
- Starting a new development task tracked in GitHub Issues
- You want a standardized approach to issue creation and planning
- You need to break down large work into structured phases
- Following the practice of planning before implementation
Prerequisites
- GitHub CLI (
gh) installed and authenticated - Git repository initialized with GitHub remote
- Write access to repository
gh auth statusshows valid authentication
Steps
Step 1: Gather Issue Description
Prompt the user for a structured issue description with these sections:
Required Information:
- Title: Concise title (max 72 characters)
- Overview: Brief description of what needs to be done
- Acceptance Criteria: Definition of done (bullet points)
- Scope: Files or areas affected
- Technical Notes: Implementation considerations (optional)
Prompt Template:
Please provide the following for your GitHub issue:
1. **Title** (required): Brief title for the issue
Example: "Implement user authentication API"
2. **Overview** (required): What does this issue accomplish?
Example: "Add JWT-based authentication endpoints for user login/registration"
3. **Acceptance Criteria** (required): How do we know it's done?
Example:
- Users can register with email/password
- Users can login and receive JWT token
- Protected routes validate JWT
4. **Scope** (required): What files/areas will be affected?
Example: src/api/auth/, src/middleware/, tests/auth/
5. **Technical Notes** (optional): Any implementation details?
Example: Use bcrypt for password hashing, 24h token expiry
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 538 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 1609b0f01a32
git-issue-plan-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository darellchua2/opencode-config-template (6 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,721 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
shiplog
Recap of everything shipped since the last run - cross-repo PRs, security fixes, star deltas, and X traction, synthesized into a digest article and a ready-to-post shiplog in your voice.
connect
Choose which wiki this session uses, the team project's pages on the Nimbalyst server or the project's local wiki of files, and connect a repository to its team project. Use at the start of a task before any wiki tool, when a wiki tool returns reponotbound, ambiguousproject, pinmismatch, projectnotaccessible…
llxprt-issue-workflow
Use this skill when asked to address, fix, or work on a GitHub issue in the llxprt-code repository. Covers the complete issue lifecycle - branch setup, gh CLI usage, test-first planning, subagent delegation and review loops, the full verification cycle (including the zai-glm-flash smoke test), open code review (ocr)…
cuga-github-issues
Create GitHub issues for cuga-agent (bugs, features, epics, designs, and related work) against origin using gh, with epic → feature → issue hierarchy and GraphQL sub-issue linking. Use when the user says create new issues, report a bug, file a bug, feature request, new feature, create an epic, GitHub issue, sub-issue…