decision-support

decision-support is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction. It costs 20 tokens per session (3,260 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A decision-support tool for construction choices. It compares options using weighted criteria such as cost, time, quality, safety, risk, and sustainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess vendors, construction methods, schedule options, design alternatives, risk responses, and resource allocations.
Why use it?
It provides a structured way to compare alternatives when several factors conflict or information is uncertain.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — built for openclaw. Also seen: built for openclaw.

Good fit Use it to assess vendors, construction methods, schedule options, design alternatives, risk responses, and resource allocations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill decision-support
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for decision-support

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for decision-support

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,260 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.03260
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.01630
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00652
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00326

Measured 9d ago against content hash a7a6012af3cc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

decision-support scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

2_DDC_Book/4.1-Analytics-KPI-Dashboard/decision-support/SKILL.md · 409 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 409 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Decision Support System

Business Case

Problem Statement

Construction decision-making challenges:

  • Multiple conflicting criteria
  • Risk and uncertainty
  • Time pressure for decisions
  • Lack of structured analysis

Solution

Multi-criteria decision support system for construction projects with weighted scoring, risk analysis, and scenario comparison.

Technical Implementation

import pandas as pd
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Callable
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import date, datetime
from enum import Enum
import math


class DecisionType(Enum):
    VENDOR_SELECTION = "vendor_selection"
    METHOD_SELECTION = "method_selection"
    SCHEDULE_OPTION = "schedule_option"
    DESIGN_ALTERNATIVE = "design_alternative"
    RISK_RESPONSE = "risk_response"
    RESOURCE_ALLOCATION = "resource_allocation"


class CriterionType(Enum):
    COST = "cost"
    TIME = "time"
    QUALITY = "quality"
    SAFETY = "safety"
    RISK = "risk"
    SUSTAINABILITY = "sustainability"


@dataclass
class Criterion:
    criterion_id: str
    name: str
    criterion_type: CriterionType
    weight: float  # 0-1
    higher_is_better: bool = True
    unit: str = ""


@dataclass
class Alternative:
    alternative_id: str
    name: str
    description: str
    scores: Dict[str, float] = field(default_factory=dict)
    risks: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)


@dataclass
class DecisionResult:
    alternative_id: str
    weighted_score: float
    rank: int
    strengths: List[str]
    weaknesses: List[str]


class DecisionSupportSystem:
    """Multi-criteria decision support for construction projects."""

    def __init__(self, project_name: str):
        self.project_name = project_name
        self.criteria: Dict[str, Criterion] = {}
        self.alternatives: Dict[str, Alternative] = {}
        self.decision_type: DecisionType = DecisionType.METHOD_SELECTION

    def set_decision_type(self, decision_type: DecisionType):
        """Set the type of decision being made."""
        self.decision_type = decision_type

    def add_criterion(self, criterion: Criterion):
        """Add evaluation criterion."""
        self.criteria[criterion.criterion_id] = criterion

    def add_standard_criteria(self, decision_type: DecisionType = None):
        """Add standard criteria based on decision type."""

        dt = decision_type or self.decision_type

        if dt == DecisionType.VENDOR_SELECTION:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("price", "Price", CriterionType.COST, 0.30, False, "$"),
                Criterion("quality", "Quality Rating", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.25, True, "1-10"),
                Criterion("delivery", "Delivery Time", CriterionType.TIME, 0.20, False, "days"),
                Criterion("experience", "Experience", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.15, True, "years"),
                Criterion("safety", "Safety Record", CriterionType.SAFETY, 0.10, True, "score"),
            ]
        elif dt == DecisionType.METHOD_SELECTION:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("cost", "Total Cost", CriterionType.COST, 0.25, False, "$"),
                Criterion("duration", "Duration", CriterionType.TIME, 0.25, False, "days"),
                Criterion("quality", "Quality", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.20, True, "score"),
                Criterion("risk", "Risk Level", CriterionType.RISK, 0.15, False, "1-5"),
                Criterion("sustainability", "Sustainability", CriterionType.SUSTAINABILITY, 0.15, True, "score"),
            ]
        elif dt == DecisionType.RISK_RESPONSE:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("effectiveness", "Effectiveness", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.35, True, "%"),
                Criterion("cost", "Implementation Cost", CriterionType.COST, 0.25, False, "$"),
                Criterion("time", "Implementation Time", CriterionType.TIME, 0.20, False, "days"),
                Criterion("feasibility", "Feasibility", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.20, True, "1-10"),
            ]
        else:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("cost", "Cost", CriterionType.COST, 0.30, False, "$"),
                Criterion("time", "Time", CriterionType.TIME, 0.25, False, "days"),
                Criterion("quality", "Quality", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.25, True, "score"),
                Criterion("risk", "Risk", CriterionType.RISK, 0.20, False, "score"),
            ]

        for c in criteria:
            self.add_criterion(c)

    def add_alternative(self, alternative: Alternative):
        """Add decision alternative."""
        self.alternatives[alternative.alternative_id] = alternative

    def normalize_scores(self) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, float]]:
        """Normalize scores to 0-1 scale."""

        normalized = {}

        for criterion_id, criterion in self.criteria.items():
            values = [alt.scores.get(criterion_id, 0) for alt in self.alternatives.values()]

            if not values or max(values) == min(values):
                for alt_id in self.alternatives:
                    if alt_id not in normalized:
                        normalized[alt_id] = {}
                    normalized[alt_id][criterion_id] = 0.5
                continue

            min_val, max_val = min(values), max(values)
            range_val = max_val - min_val

            for alt_id, alt in self.alternatives.items():
                if alt_id not in normalized:
                    normalized[alt_id] = {}

                raw_score = alt.scores.get(criterion_id, 0)

                # Normalize
                norm_score = (raw_score - min_val) / range_val if range_val > 0 else 0.5

                # Invert if lower is better
                if not criterion.higher_is_better:
                    norm_score = 1 - norm_score

                normalized[alt_id][criterion_id] = round(norm_score, 4)

        return normalized

    def calculate_weighted_scores(self) -> Dict[str, float]:
        """Calculate weighted scores for all alternatives."""

        normalized = self.normalize_scores()
        weighted = {}

        for alt_id, scores in normalized.items():
            total = 0
            for criterion_id, norm_score in scores.items():
                weight = self.criteria[criterion_id].weight
                total += norm_score * weight
            weighted[alt_id] = round(total, 4)

        return weighted

    def analyze_alternatives(self) -> List[DecisionResult]:
        """Analyze and rank all alternatives."""

        weighted_scores = self.calculate_weighted_scores()
        normalized = self.normalize_scores()

        # Rank alternatives
        ranked = sorted(weighted_scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

        results = []
        for rank, (alt_id, score) in enumerate(ranked, 1):
            alt = self.alternatives[alt_id]

            # Identify strengths (top 2 criteria)
            strengths = []
            weaknesses = []

            alt_scores = [(cid, normalized[alt_id][cid]) for cid in self.criteria]
            alt_scores_sorted = sorted(alt_scores, key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

            for cid, nscore in alt_scores_sorted[:2]:
                if nscore >= 0.6:
                    strengths.append(f"{self.criteria[cid].name}: {nscore:.2f}")

            for cid, nscore in alt_scores_sorted[-2:]:
                if nscore <= 0.4:
                    weaknesses.append(f"{self.criteria[cid].name}: {nscore:.2f}")

            results.append(DecisionResult(
                alternative_id=alt_id,
                weighted_score=score,
                rank=rank,
                strengths=strengths,
                weaknesses=weaknesses
            ))

        return results

    def get_recommendation(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Get decision recommendation."""

        results = self.analyze_alternatives()

        if not results:
            return {"error": "No alternatives to analyze"}

        best = results[0]
        best_alt = self.alternatives[best.alternative_id]

        # Calculate confidence
        if len(results) > 1:
            score_gap = best.weighted_score - results[1].weighted_score
            confidence = min(100, int(score_gap * 200 + 50))
        else:
            confidence = 100

        return {
            'project': self.project_name,
            'decision_type': self.decision_type.value,
            'recommendation': {
                'alternative': best_alt.name,
                'alternative_id': best.alternative_id,
                'score': best.weighted_score,
                'confidence': confidence,
                'strengths': best.strengths,
                'weaknesses': best.weaknesses
            },
            'all_rankings': [
                {
                    'rank': r.rank,
                    'alternative': self.alternatives[r.alternative_id].name,
                    'score': r.weighted_score
                }
                for r in results
            ],
            'criteria_weights': {
                c.name: c.weight for c in self.criteria.values()
            }
        }

    def sensitivity_analysis(self, criterion_id: str,
                             weight_range: tuple = (0.0, 0.5, 0.1)) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Perform sensitivity analysis on criterion weight."""

        original_weight = self.criteria[criterion_id].weight
        results = []

        start, end, step = weight_range
        weight = start
        while weight <= end:
            # Adjust weight
            self.criteria[criterion_id].weight = weight

            # Recalculate
            scores = self.calculate_weighted_scores()
            ranked = sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

            results.append({
                'weight': round(weight, 2),
                'rankings': [
                    {'alternative': self.alternatives[alt_id].name, 'score': score}
                    for alt_id, score in ranked
                ]
            })

            weight += step

        # Restore original
        self.criteria[criterion_id].weight = original_weight

        return {
            'criterion': self.criteria[criterion_id].name,
            'original_weight': original_weight,
            'analysis': results
        }

    def export_to_excel(self, output_path: str) -> str:
        """Export decision analysis to Excel."""

        with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
            # Recommendation
            rec = self.get_recommendation()
            rec_df = pd.DataFrame([{
                'Project': rec['project'],
                'Decision Type': rec['decision_type'],
                'Recommended Alternative': rec['recommendation']['alternative'],
                'Score': rec['recommendation']['score'],
                'Confidence %': rec['recommendation']['confidence']
            }])
            rec_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Recommendation', index=False)

            # All rankings
            rankings_df = pd.DataFrame(rec['all_rankings'])
            rankings_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Rankings', index=False)

            # Detailed scores
            normalized = self.normalize_scores()
            details = []
            for alt_id, alt in self.alternatives.items():
                row = {'Alternative': alt.name}
                for cid, criterion in self.criteria.items():
                    row[f"{criterion.name} (Raw)"] = alt.scores.get(cid, 0)
                    row[f"{criterion.name} (Norm)"] = normalized[alt_id].get(cid, 0)
                details.append(row)
            details_df = pd.DataFrame(details)
            details_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Detailed Scores', index=False)

            # Criteria
            criteria_df = pd.DataFrame([{
                'Criterion': c.name,
                'Type': c.criterion_type.value,
                'Weight': c.weight,
                'Higher is Better': c.higher_is_better,
                'Unit': c.unit
            } for c in self.criteria.values()])
            criteria_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Criteria', index=False)

        return output_path

Read the full file on GitHub · 409 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 409 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a7a6012af3cc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

decision-support is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (310 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 3,260 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.