decision-support

decision-support is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction. It costs 20 tokens per session (3,260 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of decision-support, MIT.

A structured decision-support tool for construction projects. It scores options against weighted factors such as cost, time, quality, safety, risk, and sustainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare vendors, construction methods, schedule options, design alternatives, risk responses, or resource allocations.
Why use it?
It brings conflicting criteria and uncertainty into one comparison when decisions must be made quickly.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — built for openclaw. Also seen: built for openclaw.

Good fit Use it to compare vendors, construction methods, schedule options, design alternatives, risk responses, or resource allocations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill decision-support
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for decision-support

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for decision-support

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/decision-support.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,260 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.03260
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.01630
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00652
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00326

Measured 9d ago against content hash a7a6012af3cc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

decision-support scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to decision-support — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

2_DDC_Book/4.1-Analytics-KPI-Dashboard/decision-support/SKILL.md · 409 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 409 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Decision Support System

Business Case

Problem Statement

Construction decision-making challenges:

  • Multiple conflicting criteria
  • Risk and uncertainty
  • Time pressure for decisions
  • Lack of structured analysis

Solution

Multi-criteria decision support system for construction projects with weighted scoring, risk analysis, and scenario comparison.

Technical Implementation

import pandas as pd
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Callable
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import date, datetime
from enum import Enum
import math


class DecisionType(Enum):
    VENDOR_SELECTION = "vendor_selection"
    METHOD_SELECTION = "method_selection"
    SCHEDULE_OPTION = "schedule_option"
    DESIGN_ALTERNATIVE = "design_alternative"
    RISK_RESPONSE = "risk_response"
    RESOURCE_ALLOCATION = "resource_allocation"


class CriterionType(Enum):
    COST = "cost"
    TIME = "time"
    QUALITY = "quality"
    SAFETY = "safety"
    RISK = "risk"
    SUSTAINABILITY = "sustainability"


@dataclass
class Criterion:
    criterion_id: str
    name: str
    criterion_type: CriterionType
    weight: float  # 0-1
    higher_is_better: bool = True
    unit: str = ""


@dataclass
class Alternative:
    alternative_id: str
    name: str
    description: str
    scores: Dict[str, float] = field(default_factory=dict)
    risks: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)


@dataclass
class DecisionResult:
    alternative_id: str
    weighted_score: float
    rank: int
    strengths: List[str]
    weaknesses: List[str]


class DecisionSupportSystem:
    """Multi-criteria decision support for construction projects."""

    def __init__(self, project_name: str):
        self.project_name = project_name
        self.criteria: Dict[str, Criterion] = {}
        self.alternatives: Dict[str, Alternative] = {}
        self.decision_type: DecisionType = DecisionType.METHOD_SELECTION

    def set_decision_type(self, decision_type: DecisionType):
        """Set the type of decision being made."""
        self.decision_type = decision_type

    def add_criterion(self, criterion: Criterion):
        """Add evaluation criterion."""
        self.criteria[criterion.criterion_id] = criterion

    def add_standard_criteria(self, decision_type: DecisionType = None):
        """Add standard criteria based on decision type."""

        dt = decision_type or self.decision_type

        if dt == DecisionType.VENDOR_SELECTION:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("price", "Price", CriterionType.COST, 0.30, False, "$"),
                Criterion("quality", "Quality Rating", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.25, True, "1-10"),
                Criterion("delivery", "Delivery Time", CriterionType.TIME, 0.20, False, "days"),
                Criterion("experience", "Experience", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.15, True, "years"),
                Criterion("safety", "Safety Record", CriterionType.SAFETY, 0.10, True, "score"),
            ]
        elif dt == DecisionType.METHOD_SELECTION:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("cost", "Total Cost", CriterionType.COST, 0.25, False, "$"),
                Criterion("duration", "Duration", CriterionType.TIME, 0.25, False, "days"),
                Criterion("quality", "Quality", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.20, True, "score"),
                Criterion("risk", "Risk Level", CriterionType.RISK, 0.15, False, "1-5"),
                Criterion("sustainability", "Sustainability", CriterionType.SUSTAINABILITY, 0.15, True, "score"),
            ]
        elif dt == DecisionType.RISK_RESPONSE:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("effectiveness", "Effectiveness", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.35, True, "%"),
                Criterion("cost", "Implementation Cost", CriterionType.COST, 0.25, False, "$"),
                Criterion("time", "Implementation Time", CriterionType.TIME, 0.20, False, "days"),
                Criterion("feasibility", "Feasibility", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.20, True, "1-10"),
            ]
        else:
            criteria = [
                Criterion("cost", "Cost", CriterionType.COST, 0.30, False, "$"),
                Criterion("time", "Time", CriterionType.TIME, 0.25, False, "days"),
                Criterion("quality", "Quality", CriterionType.QUALITY, 0.25, True, "score"),
                Criterion("risk", "Risk", CriterionType.RISK, 0.20, False, "score"),
            ]

        for c in criteria:
            self.add_criterion(c)

    def add_alternative(self, alternative: Alternative):
        """Add decision alternative."""
        self.alternatives[alternative.alternative_id] = alternative

    def normalize_scores(self) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, float]]:
        """Normalize scores to 0-1 scale."""

        normalized = {}

        for criterion_id, criterion in self.criteria.items():
            values = [alt.scores.get(criterion_id, 0) for alt in self.alternatives.values()]

            if not values or max(values) == min(values):
                for alt_id in self.alternatives:
                    if alt_id not in normalized:
                        normalized[alt_id] = {}
                    normalized[alt_id][criterion_id] = 0.5
                continue

            min_val, max_val = min(values), max(values)
            range_val = max_val - min_val

            for alt_id, alt in self.alternatives.items():
                if alt_id not in normalized:
                    normalized[alt_id] = {}

                raw_score = alt.scores.get(criterion_id, 0)

                # Normalize
                norm_score = (raw_score - min_val) / range_val if range_val > 0 else 0.5

                # Invert if lower is better
                if not criterion.higher_is_better:
                    norm_score = 1 - norm_score

                normalized[alt_id][criterion_id] = round(norm_score, 4)

        return normalized

    def calculate_weighted_scores(self) -> Dict[str, float]:
        """Calculate weighted scores for all alternatives."""

        normalized = self.normalize_scores()
        weighted = {}

        for alt_id, scores in normalized.items():
            total = 0
            for criterion_id, norm_score in scores.items():
                weight = self.criteria[criterion_id].weight
                total += norm_score * weight
            weighted[alt_id] = round(total, 4)

        return weighted

    def analyze_alternatives(self) -> List[DecisionResult]:
        """Analyze and rank all alternatives."""

        weighted_scores = self.calculate_weighted_scores()
        normalized = self.normalize_scores()

        # Rank alternatives
        ranked = sorted(weighted_scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

        results = []
        for rank, (alt_id, score) in enumerate(ranked, 1):
            alt = self.alternatives[alt_id]

            # Identify strengths (top 2 criteria)
            strengths = []
            weaknesses = []

            alt_scores = [(cid, normalized[alt_id][cid]) for cid in self.criteria]
            alt_scores_sorted = sorted(alt_scores, key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

            for cid, nscore in alt_scores_sorted[:2]:
                if nscore >= 0.6:
                    strengths.append(f"{self.criteria[cid].name}: {nscore:.2f}")

            for cid, nscore in alt_scores_sorted[-2:]:
                if nscore <= 0.4:
                    weaknesses.append(f"{self.criteria[cid].name}: {nscore:.2f}")

            results.append(DecisionResult(
                alternative_id=alt_id,
                weighted_score=score,
                rank=rank,
                strengths=strengths,
                weaknesses=weaknesses
            ))

        return results

    def get_recommendation(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Get decision recommendation."""

        results = self.analyze_alternatives()

        if not results:
            return {"error": "No alternatives to analyze"}

        best = results[0]
        best_alt = self.alternatives[best.alternative_id]

        # Calculate confidence
        if len(results) > 1:
            score_gap = best.weighted_score - results[1].weighted_score
            confidence = min(100, int(score_gap * 200 + 50))
        else:
            confidence = 100

        return {
            'project': self.project_name,
            'decision_type': self.decision_type.value,
            'recommendation': {
                'alternative': best_alt.name,
                'alternative_id': best.alternative_id,
                'score': best.weighted_score,
                'confidence': confidence,
                'strengths': best.strengths,
                'weaknesses': best.weaknesses
            },
            'all_rankings': [
                {
                    'rank': r.rank,
                    'alternative': self.alternatives[r.alternative_id].name,
                    'score': r.weighted_score
                }
                for r in results
            ],
            'criteria_weights': {
                c.name: c.weight for c in self.criteria.values()
            }
        }

    def sensitivity_analysis(self, criterion_id: str,
                             weight_range: tuple = (0.0, 0.5, 0.1)) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Perform sensitivity analysis on criterion weight."""

        original_weight = self.criteria[criterion_id].weight
        results = []

        start, end, step = weight_range
        weight = start
        while weight <= end:
            # Adjust weight
            self.criteria[criterion_id].weight = weight

            # Recalculate
            scores = self.calculate_weighted_scores()
            ranked = sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)

            results.append({
                'weight': round(weight, 2),
                'rankings': [
                    {'alternative': self.alternatives[alt_id].name, 'score': score}
                    for alt_id, score in ranked
                ]
            })

            weight += step

        # Restore original
        self.criteria[criterion_id].weight = original_weight

        return {
            'criterion': self.criteria[criterion_id].name,
            'original_weight': original_weight,
            'analysis': results
        }

    def export_to_excel(self, output_path: str) -> str:
        """Export decision analysis to Excel."""

        with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
            # Recommendation
            rec = self.get_recommendation()
            rec_df = pd.DataFrame([{
                'Project': rec['project'],
                'Decision Type': rec['decision_type'],
                'Recommended Alternative': rec['recommendation']['alternative'],
                'Score': rec['recommendation']['score'],
                'Confidence %': rec['recommendation']['confidence']
            }])
            rec_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Recommendation', index=False)

            # All rankings
            rankings_df = pd.DataFrame(rec['all_rankings'])
            rankings_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Rankings', index=False)

            # Detailed scores
            normalized = self.normalize_scores()
            details = []
            for alt_id, alt in self.alternatives.items():
                row = {'Alternative': alt.name}
                for cid, criterion in self.criteria.items():
                    row[f"{criterion.name} (Raw)"] = alt.scores.get(cid, 0)
                    row[f"{criterion.name} (Norm)"] = normalized[alt_id].get(cid, 0)
                details.append(row)
            details_df = pd.DataFrame(details)
            details_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Detailed Scores', index=False)

            # Criteria
            criteria_df = pd.DataFrame([{
                'Criterion': c.name,
                'Type': c.criterion_type.value,
                'Weight': c.weight,
                'Higher is Better': c.higher_is_better,
                'Unit': c.unit
            } for c in self.criteria.values()])
            criteria_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Criteria', index=False)

        return output_path

Read the full file on GitHub · 409 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 409 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a7a6012af3cc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

decision-support is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 3,260 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to decision-support, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens