Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill scenario-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.03884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01942 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00777 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
scenario-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- scenario-planner — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 480 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scenario Planner for Construction
Overview
Model different project scenarios to understand their impacts on cost, schedule, and resources. Compare alternatives, optimize decisions, and prepare for contingencies.
Business Case
Construction decisions require understanding trade-offs:
- Design Alternatives: Which option is most cost-effective?
- Schedule Compression: What's the cost of accelerating?
- Resource Options: In-house vs. subcontractor?
- Risk Scenarios: What if materials increase 20%?
Technical Implementation
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional, Callable
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from copy import deepcopy
@dataclass
class ScenarioParameter:
name: str
base_value: float
unit: str
min_value: Optional[float] = None
max_value: Optional[float] = None
description: str = ""
@dataclass
class Scenario:
id: str
name: str
description: str
parameters: Dict[str, float]
created_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.now)
@dataclass
class ScenarioResult:
scenario_id: str
scenario_name: str
total_cost: float
total_duration: int # days
resource_requirements: Dict[str, float]
risk_score: float
key_metrics: Dict[str, float]
warnings: List[str]
comparison_to_base: Dict[str, float]
@dataclass
class SensitivityResult:
parameter: str
values_tested: List[float]
cost_impacts: List[float]
duration_impacts: List[float]
sensitivity_score: float
class ConstructionScenarioPlanner:
"""Scenario planning and what-if analysis for construction."""
def __init__(self, base_project: Dict):
self.base_project = base_project
self.parameters: Dict[str, ScenarioParameter] = {}
self.scenarios: Dict[str, Scenario] = {}
self.results: Dict[str, ScenarioResult] = {}
self.cost_model: Optional[Callable] = None
self.duration_model: Optional[Callable] = None
self._setup_default_parameters()
def _setup_default_parameters(self):
"""Setup common construction scenario parameters."""
default_params = [
ScenarioParameter("labor_rate", 75, "$/hr", 50, 150, "Average labor rate"),
ScenarioParameter("material_escalation", 0, "%", -10, 30, "Material cost change"),
ScenarioParameter("productivity_factor", 1.0, "x", 0.5, 1.5, "Labor productivity multiplier"),
ScenarioParameter("overtime_percentage", 0, "%", 0, 50, "Overtime work percentage"),
ScenarioParameter("crew_size", 10, "workers", 5, 50, "Average crew size"),
ScenarioParameter("work_days_per_week", 5, "days", 5, 7, "Working days per week"),
ScenarioParameter("contingency_percentage", 10, "%", 5, 25, "Cost contingency"),
ScenarioParameter("weather_delay_days", 0, "days", 0, 60, "Expected weather delays"),
ScenarioParameter("permit_delay_days", 0, "days", 0, 90, "Expected permit delays"),
ScenarioParameter("subcontractor_markup", 15, "%", 10, 30, "Subcontractor markup"),
]
for param in default_params:
self.parameters[param.name] = param
def add_parameter(self, param: ScenarioParameter):
"""Add custom parameter."""
self.parameters[param.name] = param
def set_cost_model(self, model: Callable):
"""Set custom cost calculation model."""
self.cost_model = model
def set_duration_model(self, model: Callable):
"""Set custom duration calculation model."""
self.duration_model = model
def create_scenario(self, name: str, description: str,
parameter_changes: Dict[str, float]) -> Scenario:
"""Create a new scenario with parameter modifications."""
# Start with base values
params = {p.name: p.base_value for p in self.parameters.values()}
# Apply changes
for param_name, value in parameter_changes.items():
if param_name in params:
params[param_name] = value
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unknown parameter: {param_name}")
scenario = Scenario(
id=f"SCN-{len(self.scenarios) + 1:03d}",
name=name,
description=description,
parameters=params
)
self.scenarios[scenario.id] = scenario
return scenario
def calculate_cost(self, params: Dict[str, float]) -> float:
"""Calculate total project cost based on parameters."""
if self.cost_model:
return self.cost_model(self.base_project, params)
# Default cost model
base_cost = self.base_project.get('base_cost', 1000000)
# Labor adjustments
labor_factor = params['labor_rate'] / 75 # Normalized to base rate
productivity_impact = 1 / params['productivity_factor']
overtime_premium = 1 + (params['overtime_percentage'] / 100 * 0.5)
labor_cost = base_cost * 0.4 * labor_factor * productivity_impact * overtime_premium
# Material adjustments
material_cost = base_cost * 0.35 * (1 + params['material_escalation'] / 100)
# Equipment and other
equipment_cost = base_cost * 0.15
# Subcontractor
sub_cost = base_cost * 0.1 * (1 + params['subcontractor_markup'] / 100)
subtotal = labor_cost + material_cost + equipment_cost + sub_cost
# Contingency
total = subtotal * (1 + params['contingency_percentage'] / 100)
return total
def calculate_duration(self, params: Dict[str, float]) -> int:
"""Calculate project duration based on parameters."""
if self.duration_model:
return self.duration_model(self.base_project, params)
# Default duration model
base_duration = self.base_project.get('base_duration', 365)
# Crew size impact
crew_factor = 10 / params['crew_size'] # Inverse relationship
# Productivity impact
productivity_factor = 1 / params['productivity_factor']
# Work days impact
workday_factor = 5 / params['work_days_per_week']
# Overtime compression
overtime_compression = 1 - (params['overtime_percentage'] / 100 * 0.3)
calculated_duration = base_duration * crew_factor * productivity_factor * workday_factor * overtime_compression
# Add delays
delays = params['weather_delay_days'] + params['permit_delay_days']
return int(calculated_duration + delays)
def evaluate_scenario(self, scenario: Scenario) -> ScenarioResult:
"""Evaluate a scenario and calculate results."""
params = scenario.parameters
total_cost = self.calculate_cost(params)
total_duration = self.calculate_duration(params)
# Calculate resource requirements
resources = {
'labor_hours': total_duration * params['crew_size'] * 8 * (params['work_days_per_week'] / 5),
'peak_workers': params['crew_size'] * (1 + params['overtime_percentage'] / 100 * 0.5),
'overtime_hours': total_duration * params['crew_size'] * 8 * params['overtime_percentage'] / 100,
}
# Calculate risk score (0-100)
risk_factors = [
params['overtime_percentage'] / 50 * 20, # High overtime = higher risk
(1 - params['productivity_factor']) * 20 if params['productivity_factor'] < 1 else 0,
params['material_escalation'] / 30 * 15 if params['material_escalation'] > 0 else 0,
(25 - params['contingency_percentage']) / 20 * 15, # Low contingency = higher risk
]
risk_score = min(sum(risk_factors), 100)
# Key metrics
cost_per_day = total_cost / total_duration
cost_per_sf = total_cost / self.base_project.get('gross_area', 50000)
key_metrics = {
'cost_per_day': cost_per_day,
'cost_per_sf': cost_per_sf,
'labor_productivity': resources['labor_hours'] / total_duration,
}
# Warnings
warnings = []
if params['overtime_percentage'] > 30:
warnings.append("High overtime may cause burnout and quality issues")
if params['contingency_percentage'] < 8:
warnings.append("Low contingency increases risk of budget overrun")
if params['productivity_factor'] < 0.8:
warnings.append("Low productivity factor may not be sustainable")
# Compare to base scenario
base_params = {p.name: p.base_value for p in self.parameters.values()}
base_cost = self.calculate_cost(base_params)
base_duration = self.calculate_duration(base_params)
comparison = {
'cost_change_pct': ((total_cost - base_cost) / base_cost) * 100,
'cost_change_abs': total_cost - base_cost,
'duration_change_pct': ((total_duration - base_duration) / base_duration) * 100,
'duration_change_days': total_duration - base_duration,
}
result = ScenarioResult(
scenario_id=scenario.id,
scenario_name=scenario.name,
total_cost=total_cost,
total_duration=total_duration,
resource_requirements=resources,
risk_score=risk_score,
key_metrics=key_metrics,
warnings=warnings,
comparison_to_base=comparison
)
self.results[scenario.id] = result
return result
def run_sensitivity_analysis(self, parameter: str,
values: List[float] = None,
steps: int = 10) -> SensitivityResult:
"""Run sensitivity analysis on a single parameter."""
if parameter not in self.parameters:
raise ValueError(f"Unknown parameter: {parameter}")
param = self.parameters[parameter]
if values is None:
min_val = param.min_value or param.base_value * 0.5
max_val = param.max_value or param.base_value * 1.5
values = np.linspace(min_val, max_val, steps).tolist()
base_params = {p.name: p.base_value for p in self.parameters.values()}
base_cost = self.calculate_cost(base_params)
base_duration = self.calculate_duration(base_params)
cost_impacts = []
duration_impacts = []
for val in values:
test_params = base_params.copy()
test_params[parameter] = val
cost = self.calculate_cost(test_params)
duration = self.calculate_duration(test_params)
cost_impacts.append(((cost - base_cost) / base_cost) * 100)
duration_impacts.append(((duration - base_duration) / base_duration) * 100)
# Calculate sensitivity score (range of impact)
cost_range = max(cost_impacts) - min(cost_impacts)
duration_range = max(duration_impacts) - min(duration_impacts)
sensitivity_score = (cost_range + duration_range) / 2
return SensitivityResult(
parameter=parameter,
values_tested=values,
cost_impacts=cost_impacts,
duration_impacts=duration_impacts,
sensitivity_score=sensitivity_score
)
def compare_scenarios(self, scenario_ids: List[str] = None) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Compare multiple scenarios side by side."""
if scenario_ids is None:
scenario_ids = list(self.scenarios.keys())
data = []
for sid in scenario_ids:
if sid not in self.results:
scenario = self.scenarios[sid]
self.evaluate_scenario(scenario)
result = self.results[sid]
data.append({
'Scenario': result.scenario_name,
'Total Cost': f"${result.total_cost:,.0f}",
'Duration (days)': result.total_duration,
'Cost Change': f"{result.comparison_to_base['cost_change_pct']:+.1f}%",
'Duration Change': f"{result.comparison_to_base['duration_change_days']:+.0f} days",
'Risk Score': f"{result.risk_score:.0f}/100",
'Cost/SF': f"${result.key_metrics['cost_per_sf']:.2f}",
})
return pd.DataFrame(data)
def find_optimal_scenario(self, objective: str = 'cost',
constraints: Dict[str, tuple] = None) -> Scenario:
"""Find optimal scenario given objective and constraints."""
valid_results = []
for sid, result in self.results.items():
# Check constraints
if constraints:
meets_constraints = True
if 'max_cost' in constraints and result.total_cost > constraints['max_cost']:
meets_constraints = False
if 'max_duration' in constraints and result.total_duration > constraints['max_duration']:
meets_constraints = False
if 'max_risk' in constraints and result.risk_score > constraints['max_risk']:
meets_constraints = False
if not meets_constraints:
continue
valid_results.append((sid, result))
if not valid_results:
return None
# Sort by objective
if objective == 'cost':
valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: x[1].total_cost)
elif objective == 'duration':
valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: x[1].total_duration)
elif objective == 'risk':
valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: x[1].risk_score)
elif objective == 'balanced':
# Normalize and combine metrics
valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: (
x[1].total_cost / 1000000 +
x[1].total_duration / 365 +
x[1].risk_score / 100
))
return self.scenarios[valid_results[0][0]]
def generate_report(self) -> str:
"""Generate scenario comparison report."""
lines = ["# Scenario Analysis Report", ""]
lines.append(f"**Project:** {self.base_project.get('name', 'Project')}")
lines.append(f"**Generated:** {datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M')}")
lines.append(f"**Scenarios Analyzed:** {len(self.scenarios)}")
lines.append("")
# Comparison table
lines.append("## Scenario Comparison")
comparison = self.compare_scenarios()
lines.append(comparison.to_markdown(index=False))
lines.append("")
# Best scenarios
lines.append("## Optimal Scenarios")
best_cost = self.find_optimal_scenario('cost')
if best_cost:
lines.append(f"- **Lowest Cost:** {best_cost.name}")
best_duration = self.find_optimal_scenario('duration')
if best_duration:
lines.append(f"- **Shortest Duration:** {best_duration.name}")
best_balanced = self.find_optimal_scenario('balanced')
if best_balanced:
lines.append(f"- **Best Balanced:** {best_balanced.name}")
lines.append("")
# Detailed results
lines.append("## Detailed Results")
for sid, result in self.results.items():
lines.append(f"\n### {result.scenario_name}")
lines.append(f"- **Cost:** ${result.total_cost:,.0f} ({result.comparison_to_base['cost_change_pct']:+.1f}%)")
lines.append(f"- **Duration:** {result.total_duration} days ({result.comparison_to_base['duration_change_days']:+.0f})")
lines.append(f"- **Risk Score:** {result.risk_score:.0f}/100")
if result.warnings:
lines.append("- **Warnings:**")
for w in result.warnings:
lines.append(f" - ⚠️ {w}")
return "\n".join(lines)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 480 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 552e72d3bd35
scenario-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (310 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,884 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-builder
Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.
brainstorm
Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.
ecto-patterns
Ecto patterns — schemas, changesets, queries, migrations, Multi, associations, preloads, upserts. Use when editing Repo calls, Ecto.Query, or schema fields. Skip for Ash.
phx-research
Research Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto topics or evaluate Hex libraries (--library). Use when learning about libraries, patterns, or comparing approaches. Searches HexDocs, ElixirForum, GitHub.
document
Generate @moduledoc/@doc for tested Elixir features; may update their README section or ADR. Not for docs lookup, documentation audits/reviews, or capturing standalone decisions.
deep-research
Deep research and discovery before building something new. Explores local projects for reusable code, researches competitors, reads forums and reviews, analyses plugin ecosystems, investigates technical options, and produces a comprehensive research brief. Three depths: focused (30 min), wide (1-2 hours), deep (3-6…