scenario-planner

scenario-planner is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction. It costs 28 tokens per session (3,884 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of scenario-planner, MIT.

A what-if planning tool for construction projects. It compares alternatives by showing how changes affect cost, schedule, and available resources.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare project scenarios, test assumptions such as material-price increases, and prepare contingency plans.
Why use it?
It makes trade-offs easier to assess when choosing designs, schedules, staffing options, or responses to risks.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — built for openclaw. Also seen: built for openclaw.

Good fit Use it to compare project scenarios, test assumptions such as material-price increases, and prepare contingency plans.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill scenario-planner
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for scenario-planner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for scenario-planner

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/scenario-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,884 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.03884
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.01942
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00777
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00388

Measured 9d ago against content hash 552e72d3bd35, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

scenario-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to scenario-planner — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

2_DDC_Book/4.1-Analytics-KPI-Dashboard/scenario-planner/SKILL.md · 480 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 480 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scenario Planner for Construction

Overview

Model different project scenarios to understand their impacts on cost, schedule, and resources. Compare alternatives, optimize decisions, and prepare for contingencies.

Business Case

Construction decisions require understanding trade-offs:

  • Design Alternatives: Which option is most cost-effective?
  • Schedule Compression: What's the cost of accelerating?
  • Resource Options: In-house vs. subcontractor?
  • Risk Scenarios: What if materials increase 20%?

Technical Implementation

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional, Callable
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from copy import deepcopy

@dataclass
class ScenarioParameter:
    name: str
    base_value: float
    unit: str
    min_value: Optional[float] = None
    max_value: Optional[float] = None
    description: str = ""

@dataclass
class Scenario:
    id: str
    name: str
    description: str
    parameters: Dict[str, float]
    created_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.now)

@dataclass
class ScenarioResult:
    scenario_id: str
    scenario_name: str
    total_cost: float
    total_duration: int  # days
    resource_requirements: Dict[str, float]
    risk_score: float
    key_metrics: Dict[str, float]
    warnings: List[str]
    comparison_to_base: Dict[str, float]

@dataclass
class SensitivityResult:
    parameter: str
    values_tested: List[float]
    cost_impacts: List[float]
    duration_impacts: List[float]
    sensitivity_score: float

class ConstructionScenarioPlanner:
    """Scenario planning and what-if analysis for construction."""

    def __init__(self, base_project: Dict):
        self.base_project = base_project
        self.parameters: Dict[str, ScenarioParameter] = {}
        self.scenarios: Dict[str, Scenario] = {}
        self.results: Dict[str, ScenarioResult] = {}
        self.cost_model: Optional[Callable] = None
        self.duration_model: Optional[Callable] = None
        self._setup_default_parameters()

    def _setup_default_parameters(self):
        """Setup common construction scenario parameters."""
        default_params = [
            ScenarioParameter("labor_rate", 75, "$/hr", 50, 150, "Average labor rate"),
            ScenarioParameter("material_escalation", 0, "%", -10, 30, "Material cost change"),
            ScenarioParameter("productivity_factor", 1.0, "x", 0.5, 1.5, "Labor productivity multiplier"),
            ScenarioParameter("overtime_percentage", 0, "%", 0, 50, "Overtime work percentage"),
            ScenarioParameter("crew_size", 10, "workers", 5, 50, "Average crew size"),
            ScenarioParameter("work_days_per_week", 5, "days", 5, 7, "Working days per week"),
            ScenarioParameter("contingency_percentage", 10, "%", 5, 25, "Cost contingency"),
            ScenarioParameter("weather_delay_days", 0, "days", 0, 60, "Expected weather delays"),
            ScenarioParameter("permit_delay_days", 0, "days", 0, 90, "Expected permit delays"),
            ScenarioParameter("subcontractor_markup", 15, "%", 10, 30, "Subcontractor markup"),
        ]

        for param in default_params:
            self.parameters[param.name] = param

    def add_parameter(self, param: ScenarioParameter):
        """Add custom parameter."""
        self.parameters[param.name] = param

    def set_cost_model(self, model: Callable):
        """Set custom cost calculation model."""
        self.cost_model = model

    def set_duration_model(self, model: Callable):
        """Set custom duration calculation model."""
        self.duration_model = model

    def create_scenario(self, name: str, description: str,
                       parameter_changes: Dict[str, float]) -> Scenario:
        """Create a new scenario with parameter modifications."""
        # Start with base values
        params = {p.name: p.base_value for p in self.parameters.values()}

        # Apply changes
        for param_name, value in parameter_changes.items():
            if param_name in params:
                params[param_name] = value
            else:
                raise ValueError(f"Unknown parameter: {param_name}")

        scenario = Scenario(
            id=f"SCN-{len(self.scenarios) + 1:03d}",
            name=name,
            description=description,
            parameters=params
        )

        self.scenarios[scenario.id] = scenario
        return scenario

    def calculate_cost(self, params: Dict[str, float]) -> float:
        """Calculate total project cost based on parameters."""
        if self.cost_model:
            return self.cost_model(self.base_project, params)

        # Default cost model
        base_cost = self.base_project.get('base_cost', 1000000)

        # Labor adjustments
        labor_factor = params['labor_rate'] / 75  # Normalized to base rate
        productivity_impact = 1 / params['productivity_factor']
        overtime_premium = 1 + (params['overtime_percentage'] / 100 * 0.5)

        labor_cost = base_cost * 0.4 * labor_factor * productivity_impact * overtime_premium

        # Material adjustments
        material_cost = base_cost * 0.35 * (1 + params['material_escalation'] / 100)

        # Equipment and other
        equipment_cost = base_cost * 0.15

        # Subcontractor
        sub_cost = base_cost * 0.1 * (1 + params['subcontractor_markup'] / 100)

        subtotal = labor_cost + material_cost + equipment_cost + sub_cost

        # Contingency
        total = subtotal * (1 + params['contingency_percentage'] / 100)

        return total

    def calculate_duration(self, params: Dict[str, float]) -> int:
        """Calculate project duration based on parameters."""
        if self.duration_model:
            return self.duration_model(self.base_project, params)

        # Default duration model
        base_duration = self.base_project.get('base_duration', 365)

        # Crew size impact
        crew_factor = 10 / params['crew_size']  # Inverse relationship

        # Productivity impact
        productivity_factor = 1 / params['productivity_factor']

        # Work days impact
        workday_factor = 5 / params['work_days_per_week']

        # Overtime compression
        overtime_compression = 1 - (params['overtime_percentage'] / 100 * 0.3)

        calculated_duration = base_duration * crew_factor * productivity_factor * workday_factor * overtime_compression

        # Add delays
        delays = params['weather_delay_days'] + params['permit_delay_days']

        return int(calculated_duration + delays)

    def evaluate_scenario(self, scenario: Scenario) -> ScenarioResult:
        """Evaluate a scenario and calculate results."""
        params = scenario.parameters

        total_cost = self.calculate_cost(params)
        total_duration = self.calculate_duration(params)

        # Calculate resource requirements
        resources = {
            'labor_hours': total_duration * params['crew_size'] * 8 * (params['work_days_per_week'] / 5),
            'peak_workers': params['crew_size'] * (1 + params['overtime_percentage'] / 100 * 0.5),
            'overtime_hours': total_duration * params['crew_size'] * 8 * params['overtime_percentage'] / 100,
        }

        # Calculate risk score (0-100)
        risk_factors = [
            params['overtime_percentage'] / 50 * 20,  # High overtime = higher risk
            (1 - params['productivity_factor']) * 20 if params['productivity_factor'] < 1 else 0,
            params['material_escalation'] / 30 * 15 if params['material_escalation'] > 0 else 0,
            (25 - params['contingency_percentage']) / 20 * 15,  # Low contingency = higher risk
        ]
        risk_score = min(sum(risk_factors), 100)

        # Key metrics
        cost_per_day = total_cost / total_duration
        cost_per_sf = total_cost / self.base_project.get('gross_area', 50000)

        key_metrics = {
            'cost_per_day': cost_per_day,
            'cost_per_sf': cost_per_sf,
            'labor_productivity': resources['labor_hours'] / total_duration,
        }

        # Warnings
        warnings = []
        if params['overtime_percentage'] > 30:
            warnings.append("High overtime may cause burnout and quality issues")
        if params['contingency_percentage'] < 8:
            warnings.append("Low contingency increases risk of budget overrun")
        if params['productivity_factor'] < 0.8:
            warnings.append("Low productivity factor may not be sustainable")

        # Compare to base scenario
        base_params = {p.name: p.base_value for p in self.parameters.values()}
        base_cost = self.calculate_cost(base_params)
        base_duration = self.calculate_duration(base_params)

        comparison = {
            'cost_change_pct': ((total_cost - base_cost) / base_cost) * 100,
            'cost_change_abs': total_cost - base_cost,
            'duration_change_pct': ((total_duration - base_duration) / base_duration) * 100,
            'duration_change_days': total_duration - base_duration,
        }

        result = ScenarioResult(
            scenario_id=scenario.id,
            scenario_name=scenario.name,
            total_cost=total_cost,
            total_duration=total_duration,
            resource_requirements=resources,
            risk_score=risk_score,
            key_metrics=key_metrics,
            warnings=warnings,
            comparison_to_base=comparison
        )

        self.results[scenario.id] = result
        return result

    def run_sensitivity_analysis(self, parameter: str,
                                  values: List[float] = None,
                                  steps: int = 10) -> SensitivityResult:
        """Run sensitivity analysis on a single parameter."""
        if parameter not in self.parameters:
            raise ValueError(f"Unknown parameter: {parameter}")

        param = self.parameters[parameter]

        if values is None:
            min_val = param.min_value or param.base_value * 0.5
            max_val = param.max_value or param.base_value * 1.5
            values = np.linspace(min_val, max_val, steps).tolist()

        base_params = {p.name: p.base_value for p in self.parameters.values()}
        base_cost = self.calculate_cost(base_params)
        base_duration = self.calculate_duration(base_params)

        cost_impacts = []
        duration_impacts = []

        for val in values:
            test_params = base_params.copy()
            test_params[parameter] = val

            cost = self.calculate_cost(test_params)
            duration = self.calculate_duration(test_params)

            cost_impacts.append(((cost - base_cost) / base_cost) * 100)
            duration_impacts.append(((duration - base_duration) / base_duration) * 100)

        # Calculate sensitivity score (range of impact)
        cost_range = max(cost_impacts) - min(cost_impacts)
        duration_range = max(duration_impacts) - min(duration_impacts)
        sensitivity_score = (cost_range + duration_range) / 2

        return SensitivityResult(
            parameter=parameter,
            values_tested=values,
            cost_impacts=cost_impacts,
            duration_impacts=duration_impacts,
            sensitivity_score=sensitivity_score
        )

    def compare_scenarios(self, scenario_ids: List[str] = None) -> pd.DataFrame:
        """Compare multiple scenarios side by side."""
        if scenario_ids is None:
            scenario_ids = list(self.scenarios.keys())

        data = []
        for sid in scenario_ids:
            if sid not in self.results:
                scenario = self.scenarios[sid]
                self.evaluate_scenario(scenario)

            result = self.results[sid]
            data.append({
                'Scenario': result.scenario_name,
                'Total Cost': f"${result.total_cost:,.0f}",
                'Duration (days)': result.total_duration,
                'Cost Change': f"{result.comparison_to_base['cost_change_pct']:+.1f}%",
                'Duration Change': f"{result.comparison_to_base['duration_change_days']:+.0f} days",
                'Risk Score': f"{result.risk_score:.0f}/100",
                'Cost/SF': f"${result.key_metrics['cost_per_sf']:.2f}",
            })

        return pd.DataFrame(data)

    def find_optimal_scenario(self, objective: str = 'cost',
                              constraints: Dict[str, tuple] = None) -> Scenario:
        """Find optimal scenario given objective and constraints."""
        valid_results = []

        for sid, result in self.results.items():
            # Check constraints
            if constraints:
                meets_constraints = True
                if 'max_cost' in constraints and result.total_cost > constraints['max_cost']:
                    meets_constraints = False
                if 'max_duration' in constraints and result.total_duration > constraints['max_duration']:
                    meets_constraints = False
                if 'max_risk' in constraints and result.risk_score > constraints['max_risk']:
                    meets_constraints = False

                if not meets_constraints:
                    continue

            valid_results.append((sid, result))

        if not valid_results:
            return None

        # Sort by objective
        if objective == 'cost':
            valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: x[1].total_cost)
        elif objective == 'duration':
            valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: x[1].total_duration)
        elif objective == 'risk':
            valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: x[1].risk_score)
        elif objective == 'balanced':
            # Normalize and combine metrics
            valid_results.sort(key=lambda x: (
                x[1].total_cost / 1000000 +
                x[1].total_duration / 365 +
                x[1].risk_score / 100
            ))

        return self.scenarios[valid_results[0][0]]

    def generate_report(self) -> str:
        """Generate scenario comparison report."""
        lines = ["# Scenario Analysis Report", ""]
        lines.append(f"**Project:** {self.base_project.get('name', 'Project')}")
        lines.append(f"**Generated:** {datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M')}")
        lines.append(f"**Scenarios Analyzed:** {len(self.scenarios)}")
        lines.append("")

        # Comparison table
        lines.append("## Scenario Comparison")
        comparison = self.compare_scenarios()
        lines.append(comparison.to_markdown(index=False))
        lines.append("")

        # Best scenarios
        lines.append("## Optimal Scenarios")

        best_cost = self.find_optimal_scenario('cost')
        if best_cost:
            lines.append(f"- **Lowest Cost:** {best_cost.name}")

        best_duration = self.find_optimal_scenario('duration')
        if best_duration:
            lines.append(f"- **Shortest Duration:** {best_duration.name}")

        best_balanced = self.find_optimal_scenario('balanced')
        if best_balanced:
            lines.append(f"- **Best Balanced:** {best_balanced.name}")

        lines.append("")

        # Detailed results
        lines.append("## Detailed Results")
        for sid, result in self.results.items():
            lines.append(f"\n### {result.scenario_name}")
            lines.append(f"- **Cost:** ${result.total_cost:,.0f} ({result.comparison_to_base['cost_change_pct']:+.1f}%)")
            lines.append(f"- **Duration:** {result.total_duration} days ({result.comparison_to_base['duration_change_days']:+.0f})")
            lines.append(f"- **Risk Score:** {result.risk_score:.0f}/100")

            if result.warnings:
                lines.append("- **Warnings:**")
                for w in result.warnings:
                    lines.append(f"  - ⚠️ {w}")

        return "\n".join(lines)

Read the full file on GitHub · 480 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 480 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 552e72d3bd35

Subscribe to this mod's changes

scenario-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,884 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to scenario-planner, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens