Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davekilleen/Dex --skill quarter-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davekilleen/DexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davekilleen/dex/quarter-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davekilleen/dex/quarter-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davekilleen/dex/quarter-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davekilleen/dex/quarter-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davekilleen/dex/quarter-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.04479 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01792 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00896 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00448 |
Grade A, and why
quarter-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 614 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Review and synthesize the quarter that just ended. Evaluates goal completion, captures learnings, and suggests focus for next quarter.
Usage
/quarter-review— Review current/recently ended quarter/quarter-review Q4 2025— Review specific past quarter
Method
Verify the room, fiscal boundaries, target quarter, and source availability before
counting anything. Build a dated evidence ledger across goals, tasks, projects,
meetings, syntheses, reminders, and backlog records. Report unavailable sources
as Unknown with their coverage impact; never infer completion percentages from
activity or modification times. Walk through each goal with the user, separating
recorded status, observed evidence, and their assessment. Apply only configured,
dated backlog policies. Preview and confirm each processing, archive, reminder,
task, or backlog mutation separately, make archives idempotent, and read back
every destination.
Output contract
Return the quarter calculation, source/tool coverage, goal-by-goal evidence and user assessment, exact status counts with denominator, unknowns, contradictions, learnings, pillar context, and backlog observations under the named policy source and policy date. Unavailable sources remain visible and excluded from affected counts. Never output an inferred completion percentage. End with separate mutation receipts for every confirmed write or external action; label partial or failed operations explicitly, and call the archive verified only after byte-for-byte read-back.
Step 0: Check if Quarterly Planning is Enabled
Read System/user-profile.yaml:
- Check
capabilities.quarter_goals.enabled; only when that key is absent, honor legacyquarterly_planning.enabled. - If
false:- Display: "The Quarter Goals room is off. Enable it with
/manage-capabilitieswhen you want it." - End command
- Display: "The Quarter Goals room is off. Enable it with
- If
true: Continue to Step 1
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago Changed · +2 lines 81b793f5749e
- 2mo ago First seen · 612 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A a55db8afede1
quarter-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository davekilleen/Dex (512 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 4,479 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
quarter-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| quarter-reviewdavekilleen/Dex | Skill | 512 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code, Codex |
| nft-standardswshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |
| istio-traffic-managementwshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| projection-patternswshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| 9router-web-searchdecolua/9router | Skill | 32k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 74 | Claude Code, Codex |
| microservices-patternswshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| track-managementwshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |