Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit --skill git-workflow-helpergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit/git-workflow-helper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit/git-workflow-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit/git-workflow-helper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit/git-workflow-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit/git-workflow-helper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.02018 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow-helper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to git-workflow-helper — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 362 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow Helper Skill
Purpose
Automates common git workflow tasks while enforcing best practices and commit standards. Implements FR-008 from the feature specification. Follows constitutional requirement for feature branching and proper git workflow.
How It Works
Step 1: Git Status Check
Always start with status to understand current state:
# Check git status
git status
# Check branch name
git branch --show-current
# Check for uncommitted changes
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat
# Check unpushed commits
git log @{u}.. --oneline
Report:
📊 Git Status
Branch: feature/new-feature
Tracking: origin/feature/new-feature
Changes:
Modified: 3 files
Staged: 1 file
Untracked: 2 files
Unpushed commits: 2
Files:
M src/api/users.ts
M tests/users.test.ts
?? docs/API.md
Step 2: Branch Creation
Create feature branch following naming conventions:
# Feature branch
git checkout -b feature/feature-name
# Bug fix branch
git checkout -b fix/bug-description
# Documentation branch
git checkout -b docs/topic
# Test branch
git checkout -b test/test-description
# Refactor branch
git checkout -b refactor/refactor-description
Step 3: Stage Files
Intelligently stage relevant files:
# Stage specific files
git add src/api/users.ts src/models/user.ts
# Stage all in directory
git add src/
# Check what will be committed
git diff --cached
Avoid staging:
- Build artifacts (dist/, build/)
- Dependencies (node_modules/)
- Secrets (.env, credentials.json)
- Temporary files (*.tmp, *.log)
Step 4: Generate Conventional Commit Message
Follow conventional commit format:
Format: <type>(<scope>): <description>
Types:
feat: New featurefix: Bug fixdocs: Documentation onlystyle: Formatting changesrefactor: Code restructuringtest: Adding/updating testschore: Build process or auxiliary tools
Example Generation:
Analyze staged changes:
git diff --cached --name-only
# Output:
# src/api/users.ts
# src/models/user.ts
# tests/users.test.ts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 362 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 1130e98dd6fa
git-workflow-helper is a skill published in the GitHub repository davidmatousek/agentic-oriented-development-kit (24 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 2,018 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to git-workflow-helper, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.