Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to davidmatousek/tachi. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davidmatousek/tachi/main/.claude/skills/git-workflow-helper/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidmatousek/tachiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidmatousek/tachi/git-workflow-helper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidmatousek/tachi/git-workflow-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidmatousek/tachi/git-workflow-helper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidmatousek/tachi/git-workflow-helper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidmatousek/tachi/git-workflow-helper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 92 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Tool Misuse · line 163 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.02018 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00404 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow-helper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- git-workflow-helper — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 362 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow Helper Skill
Purpose
Automates common git workflow tasks while enforcing best practices and commit standards. Implements FR-008 from the feature specification. Follows constitutional requirement for feature branching and proper git workflow.
How It Works
Step 1: Git Status Check
Always start with status to understand current state:
# Check git status
git status
# Check branch name
git branch --show-current
# Check for uncommitted changes
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat
# Check unpushed commits
git log @{u}.. --oneline
Report:
📊 Git Status
Branch: feature/new-feature
Tracking: origin/feature/new-feature
Changes:
Modified: 3 files
Staged: 1 file
Untracked: 2 files
Unpushed commits: 2
Files:
M src/api/users.ts
M tests/users.test.ts
?? docs/API.md
Step 2: Branch Creation
Create feature branch following naming conventions:
# Feature branch
git checkout -b feature/feature-name
# Bug fix branch
git checkout -b fix/bug-description
# Documentation branch
git checkout -b docs/topic
# Test branch
git checkout -b test/test-description
# Refactor branch
git checkout -b refactor/refactor-description
Step 3: Stage Files
Intelligently stage relevant files:
# Stage specific files
git add src/api/users.ts src/models/user.ts
# Stage all in directory
git add src/
# Check what will be committed
git diff --cached
Avoid staging:
- Build artifacts (dist/, build/)
- Dependencies (node_modules/)
- Secrets (.env, credentials.json)
- Temporary files (*.tmp, *.log)
Step 4: Generate Conventional Commit Message
Follow conventional commit format:
Format: <type>(<scope>): <description>
Types:
feat: New featurefix: Bug fixdocs: Documentation onlystyle: Formatting changesrefactor: Code restructuringtest: Adding/updating testschore: Build process or auxiliary tools
Example Generation:
Analyze staged changes:
git diff --cached --name-only
# Output:
# src/api/users.ts
# src/models/user.ts
# tests/users.test.ts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 362 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 1130e98dd6fa
git-workflow-helper is a skill published in the GitHub repository davidmatousek/tachi (94 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 2,018 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-secret-scanning-with-gitleaks
This skill covers implementing Gitleaks for detecting and preventing hardcoded secrets in git repositories. It addresses configuring pre-commit hooks, CI/CD pipeline integration, custom rule authoring for organization-specific secrets, baseline management for existing repositories, and remediation workflows for…
PeerScan
Scan GitHub PR activity for engineering team assessment. USE WHEN user mentions peer scan, PR scan, GitHub activity, team assessment, engineering review, OR developer performance evidence. Generates structured reports from GitHub PR data.
summarize-changes
Summarizes uncommitted changes and flags anything risky.
openspec-archive-change
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
changelog-writer
Write a CHANGELOG entry from the commits since the last tag, grouped into added, changed and fixed.
git-commit
Commit to Git safely: runs tests, security-reviews the diff, strips secrets and dead code, and enforces clean messages. Use before any commit or push.