Claude Code Templates is a command-line tool and catalogue for configuring Anthropic’s Claude Code with agents, commands, settings, hooks, integrations, skills, and project templates. Developers use it to browse and install reusable components for their coding workflows. The catalogue includes many of these Claude Code components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill geminigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templatesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/gemini)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/gemini/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/gemini.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 10 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Excessive Agency · line 65 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 68 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 73 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 112 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 127 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 138 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 120 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 149 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 49 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 50 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.02510 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01255 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00502 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00251 |
Grade A, and why
gemini scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Gemini Skill Guide
When to Use Gemini
- WHEN ASKED TO BE ACTIVATED
- Code Review: Comprehensive code reviews across multiple files
- Plan Review: Analyzing architectural plans, technical specifications, or project roadmaps
- Big Context Processing: Tasks requiring >200k tokens of context (entire codebases, documentation sets)
- Multi-file Analysis: Understanding relationships and patterns across many files
⚠️ Critical: Background/Non-Interactive Mode Warning
NEVER use --approval-mode default in background or non-interactive shells (like Claude Code tool calls). It will hang indefinitely waiting for approval prompts that cannot be provided.
For automated/background reviews:
- ✅ Use
--approval-mode yolofor fully automated execution - ✅ OR wrap with timeout:
timeout 300 gemini ... - ❌ NEVER use
--approval-mode defaultwithout interactive terminal
Symptoms of hung Gemini:
- Process running 20+ minutes with 0% CPU usage
- No network activity
- Process state shows 'S' (sleeping)
Fix hung process:
# Check if hung
ps aux | grep gemini | grep -v grep
# Kill if necessary
pkill -9 -f "gemini.*gemini-3-pro-preview"
Running a Task
-
Ask the user (via
AskUserQuestion) which model to use in a single prompt. Available models:gemini-3-pro-preview⭐ (flagship model, best for coding & complex reasoning, 35% better at software engineering than 2.5 Pro)gemini-3-flash(sub-second latency, distilled from 3 Pro, best for speed-critical tasks)gemini-2.5-pro(legacy option, strong all-around performance)gemini-2.5-flash(legacy option, cost-efficient with thinking capabilities)gemini-2.5-flash-lite(legacy option, fastest processing)
-
Select the approval mode based on the task:
default: Prompt for approval (⚠️ ONLY for interactive terminal sessions)auto_edit: Auto-approve edit tools only (for code reviews with suggestions)yolo: Auto-approve all tools (✅ REQUIRED for background/automated tasks)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 224 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A bc9c52aafed2
gemini is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates (30,566 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,510 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ccc-makeover
Built on /ultrareview (v2.1.111 native) — the xray sub-skill wraps /ultrareview for deep multi-dimensional analysis, extending it with the CCC scoring framework.
code-review
Review code for correctness, naming conventions, style, error handling, security, and scaling concerns. Use when reviewing code, checking a diff, auditing a function, or asking about code quality. Covers Python, PySpark, SQL, KQL, DAX, and data-engineering patterns.
full-review
Full project review from beginning. Check every file. Plain language report.
ccc-code-review
Review code changes for security, performance, correctness, and maintainability. Use when: 'review code', 'PR review', 'check changes', 'review my diff', 'is this…
couchbase-coding-standards
Apply coding standards and a style guide for writing production application code against Couchbase, combining general software-engineering best practices (naming, functions, error handling, testing, docstrings, version control, code review, secrets hygiene) with Couchbase-specific conventions (SDK idioms, document-key…
code-reviewer
Perform thorough code reviews — bugs, security issues, performance bottlenecks, style violations, and architectural concerns.