Claude Code Templates is a command-line tool and catalogue for configuring Anthropic’s Claude Code with agents, commands, settings, hooks, integrations, skills, and project templates. Developers use it to browse and install reusable components for their coding workflows. The catalogue includes many of these Claude Code components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-evaluationnpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill llm-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templatesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-evaluation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.03220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01610 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00644 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00322 |
Grade A, and why
llm-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- llm-evaluation — 92% identical, 3 lines differ
- llm-evaluation — 83% identical, 10 lines differ
- llm-evaluation — 83% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 487 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Evaluation
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to llm evaluation
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Use this skill when
- Measuring LLM application performance systematically
- Comparing different models or prompts
- Detecting performance regressions before deployment
- Validating improvements from prompt changes
- Building confidence in production systems
- Establishing baselines and tracking progress over time
- Debugging unexpected model behavior
Core Evaluation Types
1. Automated Metrics
Fast, repeatable, scalable evaluation using computed scores.
Text Generation:
- BLEU: N-gram overlap (translation)
- ROUGE: Recall-oriented (summarization)
- METEOR: Semantic similarity
- BERTScore: Embedding-based similarity
- Perplexity: Language model confidence
Classification:
- Accuracy: Percentage correct
- Precision/Recall/F1: Class-specific performance
- Confusion Matrix: Error patterns
- AUC-ROC: Ranking quality
Retrieval (RAG):
- MRR: Mean Reciprocal Rank
- NDCG: Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain
- Precision@K: Relevant in top K
- Recall@K: Coverage in top K
2. Human Evaluation
Manual assessment for quality aspects difficult to automate.
Dimensions:
- Accuracy: Factual correctness
- Coherence: Logical flow
- Relevance: Answers the question
- Fluency: Natural language quality
- Safety: No harmful content
- Helpfulness: Useful to the user
3. LLM-as-Judge
Use stronger LLMs to evaluate weaker model outputs.
Approaches:
- Pointwise: Score individual responses
- Pairwise: Compare two responses
- Reference-based: Compare to gold standard
- Reference-free: Judge without ground truth
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 487 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 5389d5170f61
llm-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates (30,542 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 3,220 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-architect
Designs clear, testable prompts for agent workflows. Use when creating new prompts, refining weak prompts, or establishing reusable prompting patterns.
ccc-prompt-fix
Fix and sharpen a prompt. Diagnoses it against the 6 prompt-quality patterns, returns a tightened rewrite with the reasoning, and suggests the right library prompt for your task.
fabric-semantic-model-ai-instructions
Use when configuring AI instructions on a Power BI semantic model — the 10,000-character blob attached via Prep data for AI → Add AI instructions in Desktop or the service. Applies everywhere Copilot uses the model (reports, Q&A, Copilot pane). Covers what belongs in the blob (business context, terminology, date…
ai-workflow
Set up LLM workflow discipline for projects that use AI / LLM calls in production or eval suites. Authors an eval-cost-watcher agent that projects token cost BEFORE regression evals run, plus an AI-workflow-discipline rule covering mock-mode placement, fixture freshness, and multi-stage cost accumulation. Optionally a…
brain-prompt
Metaprompting assistant — "/brain-prompt " turns a rough ask into "the right prompt": a complete, tuned master prompt with SPARC phases, per-phase rubrics, standing rules, and cost guardrails, ready to paste or run. Use when the user says "/brain-prompt", "brain prompt", "write me the right prompt for this", "turn…
midjourney-prompter
Engineer Midjourney prompts — style references, aspect ratios, negative prompts, and v6 parameter tuning.