Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace --skill llm-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/llm-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/llm-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/llm-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/llm-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/llm-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00649 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00325 |
Grade A, and why
llm-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to llm-evaluation — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 487 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: llm-evaluation description: Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks. tags: [ai, llm]
LLM Evaluation
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to llm evaluation
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
Use this skill when
- Measuring LLM application performance systematically
- Comparing different models or prompts
- Detecting performance regressions before deployment
- Validating improvements from prompt changes
- Building confidence in production systems
- Establishing baselines and tracking progress over time
- Debugging unexpected model behavior
Core Evaluation Types
1. Automated Metrics
Fast, repeatable, scalable evaluation using computed scores.
Text Generation:
- BLEU: N-gram overlap (translation)
- ROUGE: Recall-oriented (summarization)
- METEOR: Semantic similarity
- BERTScore: Embedding-based similarity
- Perplexity: Language model confidence
Classification:
- Accuracy: Percentage correct
- Precision/Recall/F1: Class-specific performance
- Confusion Matrix: Error patterns
- AUC-ROC: Ranking quality
Retrieval (RAG):
- MRR: Mean Reciprocal Rank
- NDCG: Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain
- Precision@K: Relevant in top K
- Recall@K: Coverage in top K
2. Human Evaluation
Manual assessment for quality aspects difficult to automate.
Dimensions:
- Accuracy: Factual correctness
- Coherence: Logical flow
- Relevance: Answers the question
- Fluency: Natural language quality
- Safety: No harmful content
- Helpfulness: Useful to the user
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 487 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 69c49f596c3f
llm-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace (33 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,245 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to llm-evaluation, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ml-data-leakage-guard
Detects and prevents data leakage in machine learning and mathematical modeling. Use after ML tasks involving data cleaning, feature engineering, data augmentation, algorithm development, normalization, missing value imputation, dimensionality reduction, feature selection, or time series modeling. Checks if…
dataset-evaluation
Validates dataset formatting and quality for SageMaker model fine-tuning (SFT, DPO, or RLVR). Use when the user says "is my dataset okay", "evaluate my data", "check my training data", "I have my own data", or before starting any fine-tuning job. Detects file format, checks schema compliance against the selected model…
ai-observability-promptfoo
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation.
dataset-builder
Construction et curation de datasets pour l'entraînement ML (nettoyage, augmentation, annotation, split, versioning, qualité, datacard). Se déclenche avec "dataset", "données d'entraînement", "annotation", "data augmentation", "train/test split". Also triggers on "build a dataset", "data labeling".
agent-evaluation
Evaluate stochastic LLM/RAG/model/retrieval/tool agents in trials. Compare baseline/candidate on development/sealed holdouts with calibrated deterministic/model/trace graders; measure reliability, variance, leakage, safety, and cost.
llm-testing
Use this skill when you need to test LLM behavior, failure modes, and evidence-based quality boundaries; triggers include llm testing.