Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development --skill aaid-bdd-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development/aaid-bdd-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development/aaid-bdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development/aaid-bdd-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development/aaid-bdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development/aaid-bdd-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00180 | $0.01606 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00090 | $0.00803 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00321 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
aaid-bdd-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 141 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A 8c407df713e4
aaid-bdd-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository dawid-dahl-umain/augmented-ai-development (26 stars, last pushed 11d ago), with no licence file. It adds 180 tokens to every session and 1,606 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
nw-ad-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof.
nw-bdd-methodology
BDD patterns for acceptance test design - Given-When-Then structure, scenario writing rules, pytest-bdd implementation, anti-patterns, and living documentation.
testing
TDD/BDD testing principles. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, setting up testing, or discussing test strategy and test architecture.
review-screenshot
A standard workflow for taking screenshots to check a user interface, using a dedicated review process for different verification modes.
testing-expert
Expert-level software testing with unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, TDD/BDD, and testing best practices. Use when the user mentions TDD, BDD, unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests, or when the task involves Testing Fundamentals, Unit Testing, Integration Testing, or End-to-End Testing.
qa
QA workflow that validates a running application against Gherkin user stories. Use when running /qa or /qa:new-story, writing user stories under docs/user-stories/, decomposing Gherkin scenarios into Playwright and Tidewave validation work, mapping Given/When/Then to a RED/GREEN TDD loop, or filing observed behavior…