Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.04766 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01906 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00953 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00477 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 475 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing
Seven modes. Match the request to one mode and follow its section. Read repository CLAUDE.md first -- project conventions override defaults here.
Mode Selection
| Request matches | Go to |
|---|---|
| Write tests first, TDD, red-green-refactor | TDD |
| Flaky, brittle, test smell, over-mocking, slow tests | Pattern Quality |
| Audit or prune low-value, duplicate, or implementation-coupled tests | Test Audit |
| Test an agent, subagent testing, validate agent | Agent Testing |
| Run vitest, JavaScript/TypeScript tests | Vitest Runner |
| Playwright, E2E, end-to-end, browser test | E2E (Playwright) |
| Verify completion, final check, defense in depth | Verification |
TDD
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with strict phase gates. Each feature gets its own cycle. Do not batch multiple features into one cycle.
Phase 1: RED -- Write a Failing Test
Write a test describing desired behavior before implementation exists. Use Arrange-Act-Assert, descriptive names, one concept per test. Run the test and show full output.
Every new or changed test, in any mode, must first pass the authoring gate in
references/audit-test-value.md.
Gate -- proceed only when all true:
- Test file created and saved
- Test executed
- Output shows FAILURE (not syntax/import error)
- Failure indicates missing implementation
If test passes before implementation: assertions are too weak, or the feature already exists. If test fails for wrong reason (syntax, import, setup): fix those first, then re-run until it fails for the right reason.
Phase 2: GREEN -- Minimum Implementation
Write ONLY enough code to make the failing test pass. No extra features. Hardcoded values are acceptable initially. Run the test and the full suite; show complete output.
Gate -- proceed only when all true:
- New test passes
- Full suite executed
- No other tests broken
Phase 3: REFACTOR
Improve code quality without changing behavior. Establish a green baseline, refactor incrementally, run tests after every step. Test behavior, not internals.
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/agents-examples-and-errors.md 5.4 KB
- references/agents-testing-patterns.md 4.0 KB
- references/audit-test-value.md 8.3 KB
- references/e2e-async.md 8.9 KB
- references/e2e-auth.md 12 KB
- references/e2e-financial-flows.md 1.7 KB
- references/e2e-playwright-patterns.md 8.4 KB
- references/e2e-templates.md 6.9 KB
- references/e2e-wallet-testing.md 2.2 KB
- references/patterns-blind-spot-taxonomy.md 4.5 KB
- references/patterns-fix-strategies.md 5.0 KB
- references/patterns-load-test-scenarios.md 4.8 KB
- references/patterns-preferred-pattern-catalog.md 14 KB
- references/patterns-quality-catalog.md 7.9 KB
- references/tdd-examples.md 19 KB
- references/tdd-phase-guidance.md 10 KB
- references/verify-adversarial-methodology.md 9.5 KB
- references/verify-checklist.md 15 KB
- references/verify-verification-examples.md 15 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +5 lines aae305d4d046
- 17d ago Changed · +32 lines · +4 tokens per session fbe977598514
- 20d ago Changed · +364 lines 69f787cca711
- 26d ago Changed · -364 lines bcfc0b805363
- 27d ago First seen · 438 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 3f8c82216c33
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository notque/vexjoy-agent (442 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 4,766 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
asc-shots-pipeline
Orchestrate iOS screenshot automation with xcodebuild/simctl for build-run, AXe for UI actions, JSON settings and plan files, Koubou-based framing (asc screenshots frame), and screenshot upload (asc screenshots upload). Use when users ask for automated screenshot capture, AXe-driven simulator flows, frame composition…
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…
nw-test-design-mandates
Design mandates for acceptance tests - hexagonal boundary, business language abstraction, user journey completeness, pure function extraction, 3 Pillars (domain language / chained narrative / production composition), and the layered ATD discipline (Universe-bound assertion, layer-dependent PBT mode, two-tier…
nw-spike
Runs a timeboxed PROBE to validate one core assumption, then optionally PROMOTES the probe into a walking skeleton — the first e2e thin slice of the feature, committed and demo-able. Use after DISCUSS when the feature involves a new mechanism, performance requirement, or external integration.
nw-ad-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof.
nw-bdd-methodology
BDD patterns for acceptance test design - Given-When-Then structure, scenario writing rules, pytest-bdd implementation, anti-patterns, and living documentation.