Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add reticlehq/reticle --skill agentic-tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reticlehq/reticleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01204 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00482 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-tdd scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Predicate reference: `curl https://docs.reticle.sh/predicates.md`. Everything else: `curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt`. The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed 6adfce7d7af6
- 17d ago Changed 397ef68121a0
- 23d ago Changed 8ebc9ccab2f6
- 24d ago Changed 413bb16c7681
- 29d ago Changed 94a6c31eb518
- 1mo ago Changed c966ef237ec0
- 1mo ago Changed 3adb0b3ae500
- 1mo ago Changed 6a293aa89b42
- 1mo ago Changed 71ac4c290fba
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 421e3e971eb3
agentic-tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository reticlehq/reticle (1,270 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,204 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
testing
Testing: TDD, E2E, preferred patterns, test-value audits, verification, agent testing.
nw-test-design-mandates
Design mandates for acceptance tests - hexagonal boundary, business language abstraction, user journey completeness, pure function extraction, 3 Pillars (domain language / chained narrative / production composition), and the layered ATD discipline (Universe-bound assertion, layer-dependent PBT mode, two-tier…
nw-ad-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof.
nw-spike
Runs a timeboxed PROBE to validate one core assumption, then optionally PROMOTES the probe into a walking skeleton — the first e2e thin slice of the feature, committed and demo-able. Use after DISCUSS when the feature involves a new mechanism, performance requirement, or external integration.
ap-implementer
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-worker; this retired role cannot perform new work.