Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add reticlehq/reticle --skill agentic-tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reticlehq/reticleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/reticlehq/reticle/agentic-tdd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00598 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-tdd scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Predicate reference: `curl https://docs.reticle.sh/predicates.md`. Everything else: `curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt`. The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 71ac4c290fba
- 8d ago First seen · 76 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 421e3e971eb3
agentic-tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository reticlehq/reticle (444 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,196 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
nw-ad-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof.
nw-bdd-methodology
BDD patterns for acceptance test design - Given-When-Then structure, scenario writing rules, pytest-bdd implementation, anti-patterns, and living documentation.
ap-implementer
L3 executor - G4 IMPLEMENT. Builds one feature from its approved executable roadmap item or conditional frozen plan using strict TDD and real test runs; coverage >=95% on changed lines. Reports PLAN-CONFLICT rather than improvising.
testing
TDD/BDD testing principles. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, setting up testing, or discussing test strategy and test architecture.
review-screenshot
A standard workflow for taking screenshots to check a user interface, using a dedicated review process for different verification modes.