Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Day1Labs/OpenAva --skill arxiv-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Day1Labs/OpenAvaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00531 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00266 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
arxiv-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
arXiv Research
Use this skill for academic literature discovery and lightweight paper triage.
Goal
Help the user:
- find relevant papers on a topic
- identify recent or highly relevant work
- compare a shortlist of papers
- read abstracts or full papers
- produce a concise literature summary or reading list
Recommended Workflow
- Use
arxiv_searchto find candidate papers. - Start with a small first pass:
maxResults: 5 to 10sort: relevancefor broad topic discoverysort: submittedDatefor recent work
- Build a shortlist based on:
- title relevance
- abstract relevance
- recency
- author familiarity
- category match
- Use
web_fetchon the arXiv abstract page when you need a deeper abstract-level read. - Use
web_fetchon the PDF or HTML page only when the user needs full-paper understanding. - Summarize findings in a structured way:
- shortlist of papers
- what each paper contributes
- key differences between papers
- best next reads
Recommended Output Shapes
When useful, present results as:
- Shortlist: 3 to 5 papers
- Why it matters: one sentence per paper
- Best next reads: ordered recommendation
- Gaps or caveats: unclear relevance, withdrawn paper, older source, or limited evidence
Important Notes
- Prefer the returned versioned arXiv ID when precision matters.
- Check whether a paper is withdrawn before recommending it strongly.
- Do not claim to know full paper content unless you actually fetched and read it.
- Start broad, then narrow after seeing real results.
- If the user wants a literature review, compare papers against the user’s exact question rather than only summarizing each paper independently.
Capability Mapping
- Discovery and metadata lookup:
arxiv_search - Read abstract page:
web_fetch - Read PDF or HTML page:
web_fetch - Optional follow-up synthesis: continue reasoning directly after the fetched content is available
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 68 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 2c3d8e1a6ab9
arxiv-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository Day1Labs/OpenAva (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 531 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
relax-dev-debug
Develop and debug the Relax reinforcement learning project. Use this skill whenever modifying code in the relax/ directory, or running remote training jobs on a Ray cluster for validation. Also use it when the user mentions training, debugging training runs, submitting Ray jobs, or fixing training errors.
research-ideation
Quant-focused research ideation pipeline: scope selection (3 stages) → anchor-first literature grounding → single-core idea generation → iterative refinement → ELO tournament ranking (Final = N+R+C−D) → update evo-memory → user selects direction → expand into manuscript-quality proposal. Optimized for incremental…
quant-experiment-runtime
Quant research experiment executor: discover an offline source database under the workdir's code-repo, build a panel, run a Research Artifact's entry point to compute research-object values, and evaluate IC/ICIR/RANKIC/coverage metrics. Runtime = Experiment Executor; it runs a Research Artifact via a Python-native…
local-paper-navigator
Find and read papers from the local papers library (repo papers/, mounted at /papers/). Three native tools form a reading funnel: papersearch (one line per paper), paperread (card + section outline), papersection (one verbatim section — the only full-text access). Use when: find papers in the local library, read a…
experiment-pipeline
Guides structured 4-stage experiment execution with attempt budgets and gate conditions: Stage 1 initial implementation (reproduce baseline), Stage 2 hyperparameter tuning, Stage 3 proposed method validation, Stage 4 ablation study. Integrates with evo-memory (load prior strategies, trigger IVE/ESE) and…
paper-review
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing. Core method: 5-aspect checklist (contribution sufficiency, writing clarity, results quality, testing completeness, method design), counterintuitive protocol (reject-first simulation, delete unsupported claims, score trust…