Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Day1Labs/OpenAva --skill arxiv-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Day1Labs/OpenAvaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/day1labs/openava/arxiv-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00531 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
arxiv-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
arXiv Research
Use this skill for academic literature discovery and lightweight paper triage.
Goal
Help the user:
- find relevant papers on a topic
- identify recent or highly relevant work
- compare a shortlist of papers
- read abstracts or full papers
- produce a concise literature summary or reading list
Recommended Workflow
- Use
arxiv_searchto find candidate papers. - Start with a small first pass:
maxResults: 5 to 10sort: relevancefor broad topic discoverysort: submittedDatefor recent work
- Build a shortlist based on:
- title relevance
- abstract relevance
- recency
- author familiarity
- category match
- Use
web_fetchon the arXiv abstract page when you need a deeper abstract-level read. - Use
web_fetchon the PDF or HTML page only when the user needs full-paper understanding. - Summarize findings in a structured way:
- shortlist of papers
- what each paper contributes
- key differences between papers
- best next reads
Recommended Output Shapes
When useful, present results as:
- Shortlist: 3 to 5 papers
- Why it matters: one sentence per paper
- Best next reads: ordered recommendation
- Gaps or caveats: unclear relevance, withdrawn paper, older source, or limited evidence
Important Notes
- Prefer the returned versioned arXiv ID when precision matters.
- Check whether a paper is withdrawn before recommending it strongly.
- Do not claim to know full paper content unless you actually fetched and read it.
- Start broad, then narrow after seeing real results.
- If the user wants a literature review, compare papers against the user’s exact question rather than only summarizing each paper independently.
Capability Mapping
- Discovery and metadata lookup:
arxiv_search - Read abstract page:
web_fetch - Read PDF or HTML page:
web_fetch - Optional follow-up synthesis: continue reasoning directly after the fetched content is available
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 2c3d8e1a6ab9
arxiv-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository Day1Labs/OpenAva (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 531 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
arxiv-research compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arxiv-researchDay1Labs/OpenAva | Skill | 11 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| jupyter-live-kernelgraniet/kheish | Skill | 213 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 70 | Claude Code, Codex |
| songseegraniet/kheish | Skill | 213 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 42 | Claude Code, Codex |
| relax-dev-debugredai-infra/Relax | Skill | 580 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 60 | Claude Code, Codex |
| access-gevety-health-biomarker-datarondoflow/rondoflow | Skill | 29 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| aminer-open-academic-searchrondoflow/rondoflow | Skill | 29 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code, Codex |
| acorn-theorem-prover-verifierrondoflow/rondoflow | Skill | 29 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code, Codex |