Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dceoy/speckit-agent-skills --skill speckit-analyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dceoy/speckit-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dceoy/speckit-agent-skills/speckit-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dceoy/speckit-agent-skills/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dceoy/speckit-agent-skills/speckit-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dceoy/speckit-agent-skills/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dceoy/speckit-agent-skills/speckit-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket warn
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.02663 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01065 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00533 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed c49c7f777774
- 1mo ago First seen · 269 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 02f0385a50b7
speckit-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository dceoy/speckit-agent-skills (153 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 2,663 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Perform thorough code review and audit of implemented features. Compares implementation against the technical plan, checks for AI-specific risks, and provides actionable feedback. Activate for: review, audit, code quality assessment, security review.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
cross-model-review
A second-opinion code review that asks a different AI model to independently inspect a change, then compares both reviews. It focuses on logic, security, consistency, and omissions.
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by OpenBitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.