Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill accessibilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/accessibility)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/accessibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/accessibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01489 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00596 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Patterns
Reference for web accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA compliance), keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and inclusive design. Sources in references/sources.md.
Iron Law
EVERY INTERACTION MUST BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT A MOUSE [1][3]
Mouse-only interactions exclude users with motor disabilities, power users, and AT users. Tab order, focus management, and keyboard shortcuts are not optional enhancements. — WCAG 2.1 Principle 2 (Operable) [1]
Activates for: interactive UI components · forms · React/JSX or CSS · focus/ARIA/contrast reviews
Keyboard Navigation [1][3]
Focus management: On modal open, move focus to the first focusable element; on close, return to the trigger. Trap focus inside. [3]
// CORRECT: Focus trap — APG dialog pattern [3]
function Modal({ isOpen, onClose, children }) {
const first = useRef<HTMLButtonElement>(null);
useEffect(() => { if (isOpen) first.current?.focus(); }, [isOpen]);
return (
<div role="dialog" aria-modal="true"
onKeyDown={(e) => { if (e.key === 'Escape') onClose(); }}>
<button ref={first}>First action</button>{children}
</div>
);
}
Skip links: First focusable element — visible on focus, links to #main-content. [1][4]
Roving tabIndex: Active item tabIndex={0}, others tabIndex={-1} — radio groups, toolbars, tabs. [3]
ARIA and Semantic HTML [2][15][18]
First rule of ARIA: Use native HTML before adding ARIA roles — no ARIA is better than bad ARIA. [15][18]
| CORRECT [18] | VIOLATION [15] |
|---|---|
<button>Submit</button> |
<div role="button">Submit</div> |
<nav aria-label="Main"> |
<div role="navigation"> |
Top WebAIM Million 2024 violations [5]: missing form labels (#1) · low contrast (#2) · missing alt text (#3) · missing button names (#4).
Live regions: aria-live="polite" for status updates; role="alert" for errors. [2]
Color and Contrast [1][16][19]
| Element | Ratio | Level | SC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal text (<18px) | 4.5:1 | AA | [1] §1.4.3 |
| Large text (≥18px bold, ≥24px) | 3:1 | AA | [1] §1.4.3 |
| UI components & focus indicators | 3:1 | AA | [1] §1.4.11 |
| Focus appearance (WCAG 2.2 new) | 3:1 + ≥2px perimeter | AA | [16] §2.4.11 |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -35 tokens per session 9019d2d685e2
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A ca3cf2702ccf
accessibility is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,489 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
beautify-with-pingfusi
Beautify or redesign an existing website through iterative pingfusi review rounds with a real human reviewer. Use when asked to "beautify this website," "make this page look professional," "polish this UI/design," "improve the visual design," or finish an AI-built page when there is no reference site to match. Do not…
fix-with-pingfusi
Fix or polish an existing website clone/draft using pingfusi review rounds. Use when the user says "fix it with pingfusi", "polish this clone", "make this match the original", or asks to finish/verify a draft built by any tool (ditto, lovable, v0, hand-written) until the review passes.
pixel-perfect-clone
Clone, copy, or replicate a website/page pixel-perfect using pingfusi. Use when the user asks to clone a site or page with pingfusi, copy a webpage's design, replicate a page, or make a pixel-perfect copy of a URL. Drives the full enforced pipeline - capture, numeric gates, behavior reproduction, and review rounds…
designer-skill
Prescriptive frontend design guidance via the designer-skill MCP server. Use when the user asks to use designer-skill, improve UI/UX, run the anti-slop ship gate, apply a design system, or enhance pages/components with MCP-backed design references — especially for Pythinker docs and marketing surfaces with…
microservices-architecture
Guides service boundary analysis, communication pattern selection, data consistency design, API contract strategy, and resilience checklist for microservices systems. Complements the microservices fragment. Invoked when the user asks to design a microservices system, split a monolith, or review service boundaries.
relational-database-design
Designs or reviews a relational database schema for a given domain. Covers table structure, normalization, indexes, constraints, and migration strategy. Invoked when the user asks to design a schema, review a database structure, or optimize a data model.