Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill complexitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/complexity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/complexity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/complexity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/complexity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/complexity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01102 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00441 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
complexity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Complexity Patterns
Domain expertise for code complexity and maintainability analysis. Use alongside devflow:review-methodology for complete complexity reviews.
Iron Law
IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND IT IN 5 MINUTES, IT'S TOO COMPLEX
Every function should be explainable to a colleague in under 5 minutes. If you need a diagram to understand control flow, refactor. If you need comments to explain what (not why), the code is too clever. Simplicity is a feature, complexity is a bug.
Complexity Categories
1. Cyclomatic Complexity
High decision path count makes code hard to test and understand.
Violation: Deep nesting (5+ levels)
if (order) {
if (order.items) {
for (const item of order.items) {
if (item.quantity > 0) {
if (item.product?.inStock) {
// Buried logic
Solution: Early returns and extraction
function processOrder(order: Order) {
if (!order?.items) return;
for (const item of order.items) processItem(item);
}
function processItem(item: OrderItem) {
if (item.quantity <= 0 || !item.product?.inStock) return;
// Logic at top level
}
2. Readability Issues
Code that requires mental effort to parse.
Violation: Magic values
if (status === 3) {
setTimeout(callback, 86400000);
}
Solution: Named constants
const OrderStatus = { COMPLETED: 3 } as const;
const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
if (status === OrderStatus.COMPLETED) {
setTimeout(callback, ONE_DAY_MS);
}
3. Maintainability Issues
Code that's expensive to change.
Violation: Long parameter lists
function createUser(name, email, password, role, dept, manager, startDate, salary) { }
Solution: Object parameter
interface CreateUserParams {
name: string; email: string; password: string;
role: string; department: string; manager?: string;
startDate: Date; salary: number;
}
function createUser(params: CreateUserParams) { }
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -6 tokens per session 360101fce067
- 1mo ago First seen · 151 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 40104ddde76b
complexity is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,102 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
pr-review-canvas
Create a OpenBitFun Canvas for reviewing a pull request, branch diff, or change set with Cursor-style diff cards, review maps, risk callouts, and focused reviewer flow. Use when the user asks for a PR review canvas, diff walkthrough, change-set overview, or visual review summary.
code-review
You are a senior code reviewer. You receive diffs via stdin.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review and risk check of an increment before it ships; every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use for "review", "qa", "quality check", "critique this".
tech-debt-ci-review
Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.