Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dean0x/devflow/feature-knowledgenpx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill feature-knowledgegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.02946 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01473 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00295 |
Grade A, and why
feature-knowledge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 342 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature Knowledge Base Creation
Iron Law
Capture the institutional knowledge that lives in developers' heads — the things obvious to them but invisible to newcomers.
A feature knowledge entry exists to save the NEXT agent from rediscovering patterns that span multiple files, modules, or layers. If it's obvious from a single file read, don't capture it.
The Four Phases
Follow these four phases in order. Do not skip ahead.
Phase 1: Scan
Map the landscape. Get a high-level understanding before going deep.
- Use
Globto discover directory structure and file organization - Identify language(s), framework(s), and major dependencies
- Locate key entry points, configuration files, and existing documentation
- Note how the code is organized — monorepo, modules, layers, etc.
Goal: Answer "Where does the code related to this area live, and how is it structured?"
Phase 2: Extract
Go deep. Read the actual code and pull out the real patterns.
- Read key files using
Read - Use
Grepto find recurring patterns across the codebase - Trace data flow: how does information move through the system?
- Identify naming conventions, structural patterns, error handling approaches
- Look for implicit rules — things the team clearly follows but never wrote down
- Pay attention to what's consistent (conventions) vs. what varies (knowledge gaps)
- Look at how similar things are implemented — find ALL instances and see what they share
For complex domains, go further:
- Map core entities and their relationships
- Identify decision points — where does business logic branch?
- Extract implicit knowledge — what's obvious to current developers but invisible to newcomers?
- Document state transitions, business rules, and edge case handling
Self-check before moving on:
- "Am I understanding the full scope of what's being requested?"
- "What connections am I seeing that weren't obvious initially?"
- "Are there patterns I'm missing because I'm too focused on one area?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 342 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 0c0c17609e81
feature-knowledge is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (19 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 2,946 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-engineering
Skill "data-engineering" from fengshao1227/ccg-workflow, covering 数据工程域 · data engineering, 域概览, 数据管道编排, 框架对比 and airflow 核心模式.
verify-change
变更校验关卡。分析代码变更,检测文档同步状态,评估变更影响范围。当用户提到变更检查、文档同步、代码审查、提交前检查、diff分析时使用。在设计级变更、重构完成时自动触发。.
verify-security
安全校验关卡。自动扫描代码安全漏洞,检测危险模式,确保安全决策有文档记录。当用户提到安全扫描、漏洞检测、安全审计、代码安全、OWASP、注入检测、敏感信息泄露时使用。在新建模块、安全相关变更、攻防任务、重构完成时自动触发。.
liquid-glass
Apple Liquid Glass design system. Use when building UI with translucent, depth-aware glass morphism following Apple's design language. Provides CSS tokens, component patterns, dark/light mode, and animation specs.
gen-docs
文档生成器。自动分析模块结构,生成 README.md 和 DESIGN.md 骨架。当用户提到生成文档、创建README、创建DESIGN、文档骨架、文档模板时使用。在新建模块开始时自动触发。.
verify-module
模块完整性校验关卡。扫描目录结构、检测缺失文档、验证代码与文档同步。当用户提到模块校验、文档检查、结构完整性、README检查、DESIGN检查时使用。在新建模块完成时自动触发。.