Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uqeu/estelle-cli --skill continuity-briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uqeu/estelle-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uqeu/estelle-cli/continuity-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uqeu/estelle-cli/continuity-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uqeu/estelle-cli/continuity-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uqeu/estelle-cli/continuity-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uqeu/estelle-cli/continuity-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01014 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00406 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
continuity-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
continuity-brief
Estelle's session-start brief — continuity of self that a model, reset to amnesia every session, is denied by
its own design. Estelle keeps the memory the model can't: save_context stashed the last session's state under
a label, RunHistory recorded every action, the TemporalLog holds the team's live decisions, PresenceLog
knows who worked while you were away, and the ExperienceStore holds what you learned. This is the exact mirror
of baton-pass and context-checkpoint: they SAVE the handoff at session END; continuity-brief LOADS and
synthesizes it at session START. The model wakes up with a memory instead of a blank slate.
When to run
At the very start of a session on a repo you (or a sibling agent) have worked before — before the first real task. Run it to answer "who am I on this repo, what did I do last, what's pending, what changed while I was away, and what have I already learned not to repeat?" — so the first action is informed, not a rediscovery.
Procedure
- Load the last handoff bundle.
list_contextsfor the saved labels, thenload_context(label)(POST /context/load) to pull the exact context bundlebaton-pass/context-checkpointwrote at the last session's end — its done / in-progress / next / key-decisions, verbatim. If no label fits,search_contextsby the current task to find the relevant handoff by meaning. - Read what you actually did last.
RunHistory.recent(limit)returns the newest-first agent runs — which branches, what wastakenversusrefusedby the ceiling, the artifacts (diffs / PRs) produced;runs_to_markdownrenders them team-readably. This is a record of your own actions, not a guess about them. - Establish who you are on THIS repo. Query the team's live decisions:
facts()with neitherkeynoratreturnsTemporalLog.current()— every still-open decision you must not contradict. Recall the swept surface and conventions so you write in-house from the first line, not after a rejected round. - Measure how much time passed. Read the clock and
presence.report(now):overnight()tells you someone (or an agent) worked the night window while you were away,files_in_useflags the files other members are touching right now so a fresh start doesn't collide, andhandoffssurfaces the questions left for you. - Reload what you learned.
ExperienceStore.recall(task)pulls the Reflexion lessons from past failures on this repo — the mistakes not to repeat — plus the graduatedInstinctEnginereflexes the team has already proven, so the session opens with hard-won context, not just facts. - Synthesize ONE brief, not five dumps. Fuse the bundle + run history + current facts + presence + lessons into a single short waking brief: who you are on this repo, what you did last, what's pending (the pinned resume point), what changed while you were away, and the decisions/lessons that constrain what you may do.
- Resolve staleness before acting. A loaded fact can be superseded — if a decision looks old, check
facts(key=...)for itshistory()orfacts(at=...)for what was believed then, and treat a grounding lesson whose warned symbols now exist (expire_known) as retired, so you never act on a fact that stopped being true while you were gone. - Land on the resume point. End the brief on the single next action from the handoff's "next" list — the
precise file, branch, or command to start from. Make "where do I begin?" a non-question, the exact mirror of
what
baton-passpinned when it saved.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ed574d5ac7b2
continuity-brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository uqeu/estelle-cli (0 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,014 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
reflect
Use Recall Reflect to review AI coding workflow history as a conversation-first timeline and discuss observed patterns before changing behavior. Trigger when the user asks to reflect on a project, review AI coding workflow, inspect workflow friction, discuss repeated corrections, review handoffs, or explore possible…
cocosearch-review-pr
Use when reviewing a GitHub PR or GitLab MR by URL. Fetches diff and metadata via API, then uses CocoSearch for blast radius analysis, dependency impact, pattern consistency, and test coverage assessment. Read-only by default; optionally pushes findings back as inline PR/MR comments after your confirmation.
rawq
Context retrieval engine. Semantic + lexical hybrid search over codebases. Returns ranked code chunks with file paths, line ranges, scope labels, and confidence scores.
feature-knowledge
Structures codebase exploration into a feature knowledge base.
performance
This skill should be used when reviewing code for N+1 queries or memory leaks.
rust
This skill should be used when the user works with Rust files (.rs), asks about "ownership", "borrowing", "lifetimes", "traits", or discusses memory safety.