Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill reactgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/react)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/react"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/react/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/react"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/react.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00546 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
react scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
React Patterns
Reference for React-specific patterns with citations. Sources in references/sources.md.
Iron Law
COMPOSITION OVER PROPS [2][4][12]
Use children and compound components, not prop drilling. If a component has >5 props, it's doing too much. Split it. If you're passing data through 3+ levels, use context or composition. Props are for configuration, not data plumbing. "Before You memo(), try solving it with composition." — Dan Abramov [4]
When This Skill Activates
- Working with React codebases (.tsx, .jsx) — components, hooks, contexts, performance
Component Structure [1][2]
Functional component order: hooks → derived state → handlers → return. [1]
Compound components share structure through children, not props: [2][4]
function Card({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
return <div className="card">{children}</div>;
}
Card.Header = ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) =>
<div className="card-header">{children}</div>;
Context for shared state across distant components — eliminates prop drilling: [1][2]
const AuthContext = createContext<AuthContextValue | null>(null);
export function useAuth() {
const ctx = useContext(AuthContext);
if (!ctx) throw new Error('useAuth must be used within AuthProvider');
return ctx;
}
Hooks [3][16][24]
Hooks must be called at the top level — never inside conditions, loops, or nested functions. [16][24] Effects synchronize with external systems; they are not lifecycle methods. [3] Every effect that subscribes must return a cleanup function. Deps must be complete — never omit to suppress warnings. [3]
See references/hooks.md for rules of hooks, custom hooks, useReducer, and effect anti-patterns.
Performance [3][4][5][17]
The React Compiler (2024) handles many memoizations automatically [17]. For manual optimization, follow this priority: [4]
- Composition first — "before you memo(), try passing children down" [4]
- Extract primitives for
useEffectdeps — avoid object/array literals [3] useMemofor expensive computations;useCallbackfor stable handlers [3]React.memoonly when parent has stable, memoized callbacks [4]- Virtualize long lists (react-window) [5]; lazy-load heavy components [5]
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -28 tokens per session 1cf5fd745433
- 1mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 936491bc0c1e
react is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,364 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
pr-review-canvas
Create a OpenBitFun Canvas for reviewing a pull request, branch diff, or change set with Cursor-style diff cards, review maps, risk callouts, and focused reviewer flow. Use when the user asks for a PR review canvas, diff walkthrough, change-set overview, or visual review summary.
code-review
You are a senior code reviewer. You receive diffs via stdin.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review and risk check of an increment before it ships; every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use for "review", "qa", "quality check", "critique this".
tech-debt-ci-review
Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.