Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills --skill ai-shaped-readiness-advisorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Data Exfiltration · line 256 Code or instructions that leak agent conversation context to external services, potentially exposing sensitive user interactions.Fix: Remove any code that sends prompts, responses, or session data externally. Preserve user privacy; never exfiltrate conversation content.
- high Memory Poisoning · line 582 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.09945 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.03978 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01989 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00995 |
Grade A, and why
ai-shaped-readiness-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 936 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 0877bad486ae
ai-shaped-readiness-advisor is a skill published in the GitHub repository deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills (7,689 stars, last pushed 11d ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 9,945 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
user-story-writer
Escribir historias de usuario bien estructuradas con criterios de aceptación y casos extremos. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir historias de usuario, crear tickets a partir de un resumen de características, convertir un PRD en historias o redactar criterios de aceptación. Produce historias listas para estimar en formato…
morning-intelligence
Interviews you across 15 questions to capture your role, topics, sources, exclusions, and format preferences, then writes a master prompt you can paste into a scheduled task or Claude Code Routine. Use when you want to set up a personalised daily news brief, build a reusable morning news prompt, or create an automated…
technical-spec-template
Crea documentos de especificación técnica estructurados que conectan requisitos de producto con implementación de ingeniería. Úsalo cuando escribas una especificación técnica, especificación de ingeniería, documento de diseño de sistema o especificación de API. Produce una especificación completa con declaración del…
explorer-pipeline
Use when asked to make an interactive 3D explorer of a topic from start to finish, go from a topic to a clickable 3D learning page, or run the whole 3D explorer process. Produces a staged run of explorer-interface-brief, model-prompt-pack and explorer-viewer-builder in order for one topic, with the hand-offs between…
model-prompt-pack
Use when asked to write prompts for image-to-3D or text-to-3D tools, generate 3D models of a topic's parts, plan the assets for a 3D explorer, or build a labelled parts list with sources. Produces prompts for image-to-3D tools, one per object, plus a parts list for labelling in which every label names a trusted…
ai-ethics-review
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety…