Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills --skill epic-breakdown-advisorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/epic-breakdown-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/epic-breakdown-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/epic-breakdown-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/epic-breakdown-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/epic-breakdown-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 593 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.05597 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.02799 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00560 |
Grade A, and why
epic-breakdown-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 680 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 4200d75b5c74
epic-breakdown-advisor is a skill published in the GitHub repository deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills (6,910 stars, last pushed 9d ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 5,597 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
customise-workflow
Customise the prd-taskmaster plugin workflow via curated brainstorm questions. The AI asks, the user answers in plain English, and the skill writes their preferences to .atlas-ai/config/atlas.json. Future runs of prd-taskmaster read that file and apply user preferences to phase gates, validation strictness, default…
expand-tasks
Expand all TaskMaster tasks with deep research before coding begins. Reads tasks.json, launches parallel research agents per task in waves using the research-expander agent. Writes findings back to tasks.json. Part of the prd-taskmaster toolkit. Use after PRD is parsed and before implementation. Invoke with…
prd-to-issues
A planning skill that turns an existing product requirements document, or PRD, into small GitHub Issues that developers can implement and verify. It groups work into complete user-facing slices instead of separate front-end, back-end, testing, and documentation tasks.
project-context-steward
A project-documentation skill that scans a new project or several related code repositories and records their shared context in a PROJECT_CONTEXT.md file. It captures the product, users, workflows, architecture, repository boundaries, terminology, entry points, and known pitfalls.
stylework-yunxiao-requirement-sync
A workflow for exporting selected requirements from Yunxiao, a project-management service, into a new sheet in an existing DingTalk online spreadsheet. It formats the result into a fixed set of columns and groups it by iteration.
stylework-requirement-planning
A planning skill for reviewing a batch of product or business requests from sources such as Excel, CSV files, screenshots, or work-management exports. It groups requests by theme and records duplicates, dependencies, unclear items, and planning assumptions.