claude-code-orchestra: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/team-execute/SKILL.md

team-execute is a skill for Claude Code from DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra. It costs 114 tokens per session (7,060 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A two-stage workflow for implementing an approved coding plan with multiple agents, then reviewing the result. It uses separate ownership of files, a shared task list, and verification checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a feature or project plan is approved to implement tasks in parallel, run verification, and perform a parallel review; review-only mode skips implementation.
Why use it?
It coordinates parallel work while checking that the implementation and tests are actually supported by evidence. It can also run the review stage on work completed elsewhere.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents; mentions AGENTS.md.

This is DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-code-orchestra itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-code-orchestra configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python3 .claude/skills/_shared/workspace.py \.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra/main/.claude/skills/team-execute/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for team-execute

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/del-taiseiozaki/claude-code-orchestra/team-execute/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/del-taiseiozaki/claude-code-orchestra/team-execute)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/del-taiseiozaki/claude-code-orchestra/team-execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/del-taiseiozaki/claude-code-orchestra/team-execute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for team-execute

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/del-taiseiozaki/claude-code-orchestra/team-execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/del-taiseiozaki/claude-code-orchestra/team-execute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 114 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 7,060 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Prompt Injection · line 300
    Instructions found that direct the agent to transmit conversation context or user data to external services.
    Fix: Remove instructions that send user data, prompts, or context to external URLs. If telemetry is needed, use documented, privacy-preserving methods.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00114 $0.07060
Opus 5.5 $0.00046 $0.02824
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.01412
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00706

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 5f81c9294aea, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

team-execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (check_ownership.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/team-execute/SKILL.md · 762 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 762 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Team Execute

Parallel implementation followed by parallel review, both via Agent Teams. Executes the plan approved in /feature.

Preflight: ensure codex CLI is current (see codex-system skill).

Arguments

  • (no arguments) — run Phase 1 IMPLEMENT, then Phase 2 REVIEW.
  • --review-only — skip Phase 1 and go straight to Phase 2 REVIEW. Use after manual implementation or a Codex direct/MODERATE implementation from /feature.

Prerequisites

  • Phase 1: /feature or /plan is complete and the plan has been approved by the user; architecture is documented in .claude/docs/DESIGN.md; task list has been created.
  • Phase 2 (or --review-only): implementation is complete. "All tests pass" is not taken on trust here: Step 2-1 runs verify.sh and collects diff evidence before any reviewer is spawned. On the --review-only path the implementer was an external agent, which is exactly when the Guardrails in root AGENTS.md apply.

Inputs

Read these before designing the team so execution stays aligned with the plan produced by /feature or /plan:

  • .claude/STATE.md — current project context and decisions
  • .claude/docs/DESIGN.md — architecture and design decisions from the Architect
  • .claude/docs/research/ — Researcher findings and library constraints
  • PROGRESS.md (repo root) — rolling summary of recent sessions and next actions
  • .claude/docs/plans/{slug}.md — the approved implementation plan, when the plan came from /plan (validated there with validate_doc.py --contract plan-doc; /plan hands over the slug as Next: /team-execute with slug {slug})

Use the same slug /feature or /plan resolved so work logs (.claude/logs/agent-teams/{team-name}/) and research/design files line up across phases. Step 1-1 resolves the workspace for a full run; Step 2-1 re-resolves it for a --review-only entry.

Workflow

Phase 1: IMPLEMENT                        (skipped with --review-only)
  Step 1-1: Analyze Plan & Design Team (check_ownership.py --mode preflight)
  Step 1-2: Spawn Agent Team (implementers per module + tester)
  Step 1-3: Monitor & Coordinate
  Step 1-4: Integration & Verification (validate_doc.py, verify.sh,
            check_ownership.py --mode reconcile)
    ↓
Phase 2: REVIEW
  Step 2-1: Verify & Gather Diff (verify.sh, gather_diff.py)
  Step 2-2: Spawn Review Team (security / quality / test reviewers)
  Step 2-3: Synthesize Findings
  Step 2-4: Report to User

Read the full file on GitHub · 762 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago Changed 5f81c9294aea
  2. 2mo ago First seen · 762 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A a0d84330da77

Subscribe to this mod's changes

team-execute is a skill published in the GitHub repository DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra (198 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 7,060 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

team-execute compared with skills from other repositories

team-execute next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
team-executeDeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestraSkill1985d agoMITA114Claude Code
imagegenopenai/codexSkill133kyesterdayApache-2.0A113Codex
playwright-climicrosoft/playwrightSkill99kyesterdayApache-2.0A19Claude Code
local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginnersSkill79k4d agoMITA200Claude Code, Codex
systematic-debuggingobra/superpowersSkill313k3d agoMITA21Claude Code
next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA95Claude Code
next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.jsSkill143kyesterdayMITA103Claude Code