Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to delorenj/mcp-server-trello. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/main/.agent/skills/bmad-review-verification-gap/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delorenj/mcp-server-trelloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-review-verification-gap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-review-verification-gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-review-verification-gap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-review-verification-gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-review-verification-gap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00100 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00040 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-review-verification-gap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- bmad-review-verification-gap — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Merged into bmad-review. Invoke the bmad-review skill on the same content with only the verification-gap lens. Present the markdown rendering only (no JSON block), listing any gap_shape: "other" findings under an ## Other findings heading. When there are no findings at all, output exactly this single line: No verification gaps found.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 4ee67cc3d735
bmad-review-verification-gap is a skill published in the GitHub repository delorenj/mcp-server-trello (446 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 100 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.