Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach/main/.claude/skills/codex-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coachWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach/codex-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach/codex-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach/codex-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01955 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00782 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
codex-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: codex-review
何时使用
- 用户说:"让 Codex 看看"、"独立审稿"、"找盲区"、"挑刺"、"换个 AI 审一下"
- 用户跑
/codex-reviewslash command - 用户在
/iterate流程中需要新一轮审稿
核心原则(死规则)
你(Claude)从不审这份稿子。审稿是 Codex 的工作。你的角色是:
- 触发 Codex 子进程
- 等它完成
- 读它写的 review 文件
- 把内容传递给用户
如果你"自己"审,整个项目的"独立审稿"价值就毁了。
输出语言策略:发给 Codex 的 prompt 体保持英文(保证审稿报告与英文论文一致 + /iterate 命令依赖固定的英文措辞模式做替换)。中文 SKILL 说明只供人类阅读,不 影响 AI 输出。
工作流
步骤 1:环境检查
codex --version
如果失败(codex 未安装)→ 提示用户:
未检测到 Codex CLI。安装:
npm install -g @openai/codex
codex login # 用 ChatGPT Plus/Pro 账号
如果 codex login 报未认证 → 提示用户登录。
步骤 2:定位轮次号
读 my-paper/review_round_*.md,找最大 N,本次为 N+1。
第一次审稿 → N=1。
步骤 3:触发 Codex
Bash / zsh(macOS / Linux / WSL,用反斜线续行):
ROUND=<N+1>
codex exec --skip-git-repo-check --sandbox workspace-write \
-c 'model_reasoning_effort="xhigh"' \
"Read AGENTS.md, prompts/reviewer_system.md, prompts/review_paper.md, my-paper/draft.md, and if present my-paper/data/analysis_results.json. Replace {manuscript} in review_paper.md with the contents of draft.md. If analysis_results.json is present, verify every quantitative manuscript claim against it and flag any mismatch or unverifiable number as a Critical Issue. If it is absent, state that numerical verification was unavailable. Produce a structured peer review per the format in reviewer_system.md. Write to my-paper/review_round_${ROUND}.md. Do not modify any other files."
PowerShell(Windows,用反引号续行——PowerShell 不认 \):
$ROUND = <N+1>
codex exec --skip-git-repo-check --sandbox workspace-write `
-c 'model_reasoning_effort="xhigh"' `
"Read AGENTS.md, prompts/reviewer_system.md, prompts/review_paper.md, my-paper/draft.md, and if present my-paper/data/analysis_results.json. Replace {manuscript} in review_paper.md with the contents of draft.md. If analysis_results.json is present, verify every quantitative manuscript claim against it and flag any mismatch or unverifiable number as a Critical Issue. If it is absent, state that numerical verification was unavailable. Produce a structured peer review per the format in reviewer_system.md. Write to my-paper/review_round_$ROUND.md. Do not modify any other files."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7ece2409719a
codex-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach (12 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,955 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
codex-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| codex-reviewdengxu11111/dual-ai-paper-coach | Skill | 12 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| hypothesessynthetic-sciences/openscience | Skill | 4.3k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 99 | Claude Code |
| review-rpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow | Skill | 1.7k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 102 | Claude Code |
| review-paper-codeclaesbackman/AI-research-feedback | Skill | 528 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| paperlab_neqsim_api_claim_verificationequinor/neqsim | Skill | 163 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 55 | Claude Code, Codex |
| workflows:reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills | Skill | 4.9k | 4d ago | none | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| referee2brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills | Skill | 4.9k | 4d ago | none | A | 61 | Claude Code |