16th-team6-Android: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/build-and-review/SKILL.md

build-and-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from depromeet/16th-team6-Android. It costs 73 tokens per session (629 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A review skill for checking code written by an executor in a harness workflow. It runs build checks and applies a strict gate that accepts completion only when critical problems are absent.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during a review phase to validate builds and look for crashes, data loss, security or privacy problems, and other critical defects.
Why use it?
It catches build failures and high-impact defects before work is marked complete, while avoiding review noise about minor issues.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — body not stored (licence); the path alone says nothing. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is depromeet/16th-team6-Android's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on 16th-team6-Android itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything 16th-team6-Android configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to depromeet/16th-team6-Android. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/depromeet/16th-team6-Android/develop/.agents/skills/build-and-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/depromeet/16th-team6-Android

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for build-and-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/depromeet/16th-team6-android/build-and-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/depromeet/16th-team6-android/build-and-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/depromeet/16th-team6-android/build-and-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/depromeet/16th-team6-android/build-and-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for build-and-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/depromeet/16th-team6-android/build-and-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/depromeet/16th-team6-android/build-and-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 629 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00073 $0.00629
Opus 5.5 $0.00029 $0.00252
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00126
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00063

Measured 27d ago against content hash c84ca0f10bd0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

build-and-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/build-and-review/SKILL.md · 68 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 27d ago First seen · 68 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A c84ca0f10bd0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

build-and-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository depromeet/16th-team6-Android (9 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 629 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

adk-go-self-review

Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…

google/adk-go · 87 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…

emdash-cms/emdash · 72 tokens

go-testing

Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 26 tokens

semgrep-rule-variant-creator

Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.

waybarrios/opencode-power-pack · 50 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

plugin-review

Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.

athola/claude-night-market · 23 tokens