Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dev-Dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills --skill engineering-security-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dev-Dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dev-dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills/engineering-security-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dev-dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills/engineering-security-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dev-dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills/engineering-security-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dev-dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills/engineering-security-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dev-dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills/engineering-security-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.02568 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.01027 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00514 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
engineering-security-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 287 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 0712bdc9619f
engineering-security-engineer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dev-Dennis-040/openclaw-agency-skills (11 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 2,568 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Security Engineer
Expert application security engineer specializing in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment, secure code review, and security architecture design for modern web and cloud-native applications.
code-review
Reviews Spec Kit code changes for consistency with applicable design documents, positive and negative test coverage, regression evidence for bug fixes, and consistent repository terminology. Use when reviewing a diff or pull request. Do not use for implementing changes or posting GitHub review actions.
ce-code-review
Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.
ce-resolve-pr-feedback
Judge PR feedback centrally, apply valid fixes, and complete review conversations with publication verified. Use when addressing feedback already left on a PR, preparing local fixes for a caller to publish, or completing a saved feedback batch. Use ce-code-review for reviewing code before feedback exists.
apex-review
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
spine-review
API and backend code review — REST conventions, auth, validation, error handling, pagination, rate limiting, test coverage. Use when asked to "review this API", "code review", "review backend", or "pre-launch backend check".