Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Devin-AXIS/iPolloWork --skill github-review-follow-upgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Devin-AXIS/iPolloWorkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/devin-axis/ipollowork/github-review-follow-up)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/devin-axis/ipollowork/github-review-follow-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devin-axis/ipollowork/github-review-follow-up/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/devin-axis/ipollowork/github-review-follow-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devin-axis/ipollowork/github-review-follow-up.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00296 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
github-review-follow-up scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a11635a74aae
github-review-follow-up is a skill published in the GitHub repository Devin-AXIS/iPolloWork (7,284 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 296 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-publish
Publish task-scoped changes to GitHub through a branch/commit/push/PR flow, including fork-based external contributions. Use when the user wants changes pushed or a PR opened; draft PR is the default.
gh-address-comments
Inspect or address GitHub pull request review feedback using thread-aware state. Use for requested changes, unresolved inline review threads, or review comments; fixing feedback authorizes local edits, not GitHub writes.
github
General GitHub triage for repositories, issues, and pull requests: inspect or summarize state and handle scoped metadata actions. Use when no review-feedback, CI, or publish specialist clearly matches.
code-review-zh
A Git-based code review workflow that compares changes from a chosen commit, branch, tag, or merge point. It checks both whether the code follows the repository's written standards and whether it implements the requested specification.
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
pre-publish-review
Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release…