Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DevInder1/supply-chain-scanner-public --skill fix-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevInder1/supply-chain-scanner-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/devinder1/supply-chain-scanner-public/fix-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/devinder1/supply-chain-scanner-public/fix-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devinder1/supply-chain-scanner-public/fix-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00602 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00301 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
fix-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Fix plan
When the user asks for a remediation plan, fix recipe, or "what should I patch first":
- Run a scan first (use
scanorscan-fullper scope). If a recent.tridentchain-out/scan-report.jsonexists, you may reuse it. - From
raw_summary.affected_components, build a prioritised plan:- Sort by EPSS score descending — the user wants the actively-exploited ones first.
- For each finding, capture: package name, current version, fix version, ecosystem, CVE IDs, EPSS score, KEV status.
- Present the plan as a table or numbered list. For each line include:
- Risk badge:
URGENTif KEV-listed OR EPSS > 0.5;HIGHif EPSS > 0.1;INFOotherwise. - Semver jump: PATCH (e.g., 5.0.5 → 5.0.6), MINOR (5.0.5 → 5.1.0), or MAJOR (5.x → 6.x). MAJOR bumps need user review.
- Exact command the user can copy-paste:
- npm:
cd <manifest_dir> && npm install <pkg>@<fix_version> - pip:
pip install --upgrade '<pkg>>=<fix_version>' - Homebrew (system):
brew upgrade <pkg>
- npm:
- Risk badge:
- After the plan, suggest the user re-run
validate-fixesonce the patches are applied — this closes the loop and verifies the CVEs are actually resolved.
Important constraints
- Never apply the commands yourself. Present the plan; let the user run it. Auto-applying dependency upgrades is the user's decision.
- Flag MAJOR semver bumps explicitly. They often introduce breaking changes; do not group them with PATCH bumps.
- Group by manifest. If there are multiple
package.jsonfiles or multiplerequirements.txtin the project, separate the commands per directory.
CLI fallback (no MCP)
tridentchain-security --scan project --project-path . --output-dir .tridentchain-out
# Open the EPSS-prioritised remediation report:
open .tridentchain-out/scan-remediation-epss.html
The HTML report already shows the EPSS-ranked remediation queue with per-package fix commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 37 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 13eff7c222a8
fix-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository DevInder1/supply-chain-scanner-public (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 602 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
bob-egress
List, add, test, enable, disable, or remove Hacker Bob egress profiles from Codex.
bob-export
Create a Hacker Bob post-release improvement bundle for the currently installed Bob version.
analyzing-sbom-for-supply-chain-vulnerabilities
Parses Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) in CycloneDX and SPDX JSON formats to identify supply chain vulnerabilities by correlating components against the NVD CVE database via the NVD 2.0 API. Builds dependency graphs, calculates risk scores, identifies transitive vulnerability paths, and generates compliance reports.…
omakase-chef
Proactive Claude skill discovery and onboarding. Trigger at the start of a new session or project, when the user asks "what should I do/install/use", when no skills are installed yet, or when the user repeats a manual task 3+ times. Observe quietly, serve one precise recommendation, install on approval, and guide the…
quick-review
Review a code diff or file for correctness bugs, security issues, and clear simplifications. One finding per line, severity-tagged. Use when user wants fast, focused code review.
[object Object]
Skill "[object Object]" from gyuch-an02/claude-omakase, covering what this skill does, when to activate, steps and examples.