parallel-code-review

parallel-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from dgalarza/claude-code-workflows. It costs 62 tokens per session (1,617 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review workflow that uses several specialized review agents in parallel.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for comprehensive reviews before merging, especially for large changes or work that needs multiple technical perspectives.
Why use it?
It provides separate perspectives on areas such as security, architecture, and performance while reducing the time needed for a broad review.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the parallel-code-review plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Good fit It is for comprehensive reviews before merging, especially for large changes or work that needs multiple technical perspectives.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add dgalarza/claude-code-workflows --skill parallel-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install parallel-code-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for parallel-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for parallel-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgalarza/claude-code-workflows/parallel-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 62 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,617 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00062 $0.01617
Opus 5.5 $0.00025 $0.00647
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00323
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00162

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 868de3eecc86, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

parallel-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/parallel-code-review/skills/parallel-code-review/SKILL.md · 283 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 283 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Parallel Code Review

This skill provides guidance for launching multiple specialized code review agents in parallel for comprehensive, efficient analysis from different perspectives.

Purpose

Parallel code reviews maximize efficiency and coverage by running multiple specialized reviewers simultaneously. Instead of sequential reviews that take time proportional to the number of reviewers, parallel execution completes in the time of the slowest reviewer while providing comprehensive feedback from all perspectives.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Performing comprehensive code review before merging
  • Need multiple specialized perspectives (security, architecture, performance)
  • Want faster review by parallelizing analysis
  • Reviewing large changesets that benefit from division of labor
  • Implementing continuous review practices

Benefits of Parallel Reviews

Speed: 2+ specialized reviews complete in the time of 1 Depth: Each agent focuses on specific expertise area Comprehensive Coverage: Security + Architecture + Performance simultaneously

Core Workflow

Phase 1: Prepare for Review

1. Check Decision Log (Prevent Redundancy)

# Search memory for previous code review decisions
mcp__memory__search_nodes query:"code_review_decision"

# Read decision log file
cat code_review_decisions.md

Decision log format:

# Code Review Decisions

## 2025-01-15: Result Pattern Required

**Decision**: All service objects must return Result objects
**Rationale**: Explicit success/failure handling improves error management
**Status**: Accepted standard pattern

2. Get Code Changes

# Get diff for review
git diff main...HEAD

# Or specific branch
git diff main...feature-branch

Phase 2: Launch Parallel Reviewers

Use Task tool to launch multiple agents concurrently:

Example: Launch 2 reviewers in parallel by sending a SINGLE message with MULTIPLE Task tool calls:

Task({
  subagent_type: "cybersecurity-expert",
  description: "Security review of changes",
  prompt: "Review git diff for security vulnerabilities..."
})

Task({
  subagent_type: "rails-backend-expert",
  description: "Architecture review of changes",
  prompt: "Review git diff for code quality..."
})

Read the full file on GitHub · 283 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 283 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 868de3eecc86

Subscribe to this mod's changes

parallel-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dgalarza/claude-code-workflows (62 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,617 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens