Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dhq-boiler/Unofficial-VS-MCP --skill vs-ui-exploregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dhq-boiler/Unofficial-VS-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhq-boiler/unofficial-vs-mcp/vs-ui-explore)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhq-boiler/unofficial-vs-mcp/vs-ui-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dhq-boiler/unofficial-vs-mcp/vs-ui-explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhq-boiler/unofficial-vs-mcp/vs-ui-explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dhq-boiler/unofficial-vs-mcp/vs-ui-explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Memory Poisoning · line 88 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01781 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00890 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00356 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
vs-ui-explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vs-ui-explore
Drive a running, debugged desktop application from Visual Studio through its UI
using the vs-mcp UI Automation tools. The goal is to visit every reachable
screen/dialog, exercise interactive elements, and collect a structured report
of crashes, unhandled dialogs, UIA binding errors, disabled-but-expected
states, and unreachable features.
This skill is the Windows/VS analogue of iOS ios-simulator-skill. It expects
the target application to already be running under the VS debugger before the
crawl starts.
When to use this skill
Trigger when the user says things like:
- "Test all the screens of this app"
- "Crawl the UI and tell me what's broken"
- "Run through every dialog and report issues"
- "Find UI bugs autonomously"
Do not trigger for single, targeted UI actions ("click Save", "open the
Settings dialog") — use the individual ui_* tools directly for those.
Prerequisites
Before starting a crawl, confirm via get_status:
- A solution is open in Visual Studio.
debugModeisRun(the target is being debugged). If it isDesign, ask the user whether to start debugging first viadebug_startordebug_start_without_debugging; do not start it silently because the user may want to target a specific configuration.- The debuggee has a visible main window (
ui_capture_windowmust not error with "no debugged process").
If any of the above fails, stop and ask the user how to proceed instead of guessing.
Crawl loop
For each iteration the agent should:
- Observe. Call
ui_snapshotwithdepth: 8,includeScreenshot: true. The compact tree returned already prunes offscreen/boring containers and annotates each node with itsrole,id,name,actions, andstate. - Fingerprint the screen. Build a signature from
window.title + focused.role + focused.automationId + top-level child roles. Skip screens you have already explored (track signatures in memory for the duration of the crawl). - Catalogue interactive targets. From the tree, collect every node whose
actionsarray containsinvoke,toggle,select, orexpand. Prefer elements with meaningfulnameorid; de-prioritize anonymousCustomcontrols unless nothing else is available. - Decide the next action. Pick one interactive target that has not been
exercised yet on this screen. Prefer:
- Buttons whose name suggests navigation ("Next", "Open", menu items, tabs) over destructive verbs ("Delete", "Remove", "Uninstall").
- Toggles and selects last, since they rarely reveal new screens.
- Act. Use
ui_invoke(preferred when an AutomationId exists) orui_click(by name if no id). Never fall back to raw coordinates. - Settle. Immediately call
ui_wait_idlewithquietMs: 600,timeoutMs: 4000so any async UI updates finish before the next observation. - Verify. Call
ui_snapshotagain. If the focused window title changed or a new dialog appeared, treat it as a new screen and recurse. If nothing changed after a non-trivial action, record that as a suspicious result. - Escape dialogs. If a modal dialog appears that you did not intend
(error, confirmation, progress), record it, close it via the most benign
option (
Cancel,Close,No), and continue. Never clickDelete,Uninstall,Reset, or similar destructive defaults. If the only option is destructive, stop and ask the user.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 173 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 29d5c7df62f8
vs-ui-explore is a skill published in the GitHub repository dhq-boiler/Unofficial-VS-MCP (16 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,781 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-knowledge
To run QA engineering — requirements/gap analysis, scenario & spec design, test implementation, failure triage — over the QA knowledge base.
mcp-java-dev-tools-regression-suite
Run MCP-first HTTP regression suites (endpoint, service, or API scope) with optional strict probe-hit verification, bounded Watchers for downstream completion checks, and external verification for downstream data validity across HTTP or SQL targets.
reproduce-bug
Reproduce a reported bug in googleapis/mcp-toolbox and decide whether it is real, delivering an evidence-backed verdict: confirmed, already fixed, misconfiguration, client-side, works as intended, not reproducible, or blocked. Use whenever a maintainer asks you to reproduce, verify, confirm, or investigate a bug…
flutter-mcp-toolkit-control
Drive a running Flutter app — tap, scroll, type, fill forms, hot-reload, navigate. Use when you need to interact with the UI.
flutter-mcp-cli-runtime-validation
Run Flutter MCP runtime validation from CLI in two steps (launch app, then run validate-runtime), including toolkit-extension gating, screenshot/layout capture, app error collection, optional reload verification, and retry handling for transient first-connect failures.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.